The idea that there will always be a remnant non-White population is just a lack of vision. Once everyone who wants to leave has left (and been barred from ever returning, even for a brief visit) then it will be necessary to remove the remainder.
At the very least, should Britain foolishly allow them to stay, citizenship should be divided between voting citizens (ethnic English, Welsh, and Scots) and non-voting citizens (non-British, with standard rights and protections, but without the right to vote, serve on juries, the military or in sensitive areas of the economy, such as education, healthcare, banking or civil service). It goes without saying that miscegenation would needs be banned.
But a better solution would be to find the spirit that allowed Britain to build a worldwide empire, roll up your sleeves, and do the hard work of liberating the nation from the yoke of foreign occupation.
And I’ll add the lyrics to a song my grandfather liked: There’ll always be an England, and England shall be free, if England means as much to you as England means to me.
...How is ~10% of the population, presumably stripped of any special privileges and not particularly high-IQ, going to "occupy" Britain at this point?
In any realistic scenario where mass deportations occur the government will already have a total lockdown on others areas of policy, like law enforcement, education, fertility subsidies etc. and so on, in which case most of the problems associated with racial grievance politics would either disappear or be greatly attenuated. (e.g, crime in black neighbourhoods and administrative corruption could be vastly reduced if the government no longer regarded racial imbalances in incarceration as a sign of awful injustice.)
Once eugenic fertility patterns are restored- and if you want civilisation to work then sooner or later this has to happen regardless of your country's racial composition- then the more capable elements of the remaining ~10% non-whites can merge into the general population through intermarriage, while the less capable elements will presumably either not leave many children behind or will elect to leave the country.
(There is, I would suggest, also the option of direct genetic uplift through embryo selection or gene-editing, though I suppose this depends on the flavour of right-wing ideology at the helm.)
Keeping in mind that IQ is a heritable trait, I do not want my grandchildren to be 10% low IQ African.
All non White foreigners have to go. If they stay, eventually, ( ( radical academics ) ) will calculate ways to leverage them against the native British and put the system back on its present course.
The current situation is not an accident. Given the opportunity, they will steer society back in this direction. Systemic constitutional change is required to prevent this.
I'll grant that regression to the mean is a concern even among high-IQ members of low-IQ groups, but I did specify conditions of eugenic fertility (i.e, where relatively unproductive individuals don't reproduce excessively or at least need to avail of designer baby tech first).
I don't automatically object to constitutional clauses reserving special rights and protections for the core ethnicity of a particular nation- Israel would be a pertinent example- but the (((radical academics))) that you're worried about have some of the worst birthrates and highest rates of intermarriage on record, so by default they'll simply merge with the gestalt mostly-white upper-class over time and lose any distinct identity.
The idea that there will always be a remnant non-White population is just a lack of vision. Once everyone who wants to leave has left (and been barred from ever returning, even for a brief visit) then it will be necessary to remove the remainder.
At the very least, should Britain foolishly allow them to stay, citizenship should be divided between voting citizens (ethnic English, Welsh, and Scots) and non-voting citizens (non-British, with standard rights and protections, but without the right to vote, serve on juries, the military or in sensitive areas of the economy, such as education, healthcare, banking or civil service). It goes without saying that miscegenation would needs be banned.
But a better solution would be to find the spirit that allowed Britain to build a worldwide empire, roll up your sleeves, and do the hard work of liberating the nation from the yoke of foreign occupation.
And I’ll add the lyrics to a song my grandfather liked: There’ll always be an England, and England shall be free, if England means as much to you as England means to me.
...How is ~10% of the population, presumably stripped of any special privileges and not particularly high-IQ, going to "occupy" Britain at this point?
In any realistic scenario where mass deportations occur the government will already have a total lockdown on others areas of policy, like law enforcement, education, fertility subsidies etc. and so on, in which case most of the problems associated with racial grievance politics would either disappear or be greatly attenuated. (e.g, crime in black neighbourhoods and administrative corruption could be vastly reduced if the government no longer regarded racial imbalances in incarceration as a sign of awful injustice.)
Once eugenic fertility patterns are restored- and if you want civilisation to work then sooner or later this has to happen regardless of your country's racial composition- then the more capable elements of the remaining ~10% non-whites can merge into the general population through intermarriage, while the less capable elements will presumably either not leave many children behind or will elect to leave the country.
(There is, I would suggest, also the option of direct genetic uplift through embryo selection or gene-editing, though I suppose this depends on the flavour of right-wing ideology at the helm.)
Keeping in mind that IQ is a heritable trait, I do not want my grandchildren to be 10% low IQ African.
All non White foreigners have to go. If they stay, eventually, ( ( radical academics ) ) will calculate ways to leverage them against the native British and put the system back on its present course.
The current situation is not an accident. Given the opportunity, they will steer society back in this direction. Systemic constitutional change is required to prevent this.
I'll grant that regression to the mean is a concern even among high-IQ members of low-IQ groups, but I did specify conditions of eugenic fertility (i.e, where relatively unproductive individuals don't reproduce excessively or at least need to avail of designer baby tech first).
I don't automatically object to constitutional clauses reserving special rights and protections for the core ethnicity of a particular nation- Israel would be a pertinent example- but the (((radical academics))) that you're worried about have some of the worst birthrates and highest rates of intermarriage on record, so by default they'll simply merge with the gestalt mostly-white upper-class over time and lose any distinct identity.