2 Comments
User's avatar
Perihelius Lux's avatar

It is White men who are the targets. The Regime is happy to present non-White men as virile, heroic, virtuous ... ... It is happy to ethnically cleanse White men from law enforcement and the military. We all know why. The desire is to subjugate and destroy The West by dispossessing and destroying its men. If The Regime depicts White men at all it is as the antagonist in his own story or as a marginalized buffoon. On the vanguard of young men are White men who know this and who are finished with colorblind civic nationalism.

The other thing they are finished with is being forced to say silent about the racial component of their dispossession and marginalization. They despise Andrew Tate. They see Tate as what he is. He is another in a long line of non-Whites who are permitted to speak on behalf of the muted White man. The Regime dislikes Tate, but they much prefer him to White men speaking on their own behalf. The vanguard of resurgent young White men are finished with being relegated as a consolation for not being disappeared. They are ready to lead.

If you want to hasten the resurgence of men, make their resurgence explicit as the men who are the creating race of Western Civilization; ethnic European men.

P.S. The quality of the writing and editing is always superb. There are a larger number of glaring grammar errors than usual in this article.

Expand full comment
__browsing's avatar

As others have put it succinctly: If you want masculine virtue, then virtue should be rewarded.

Expand full comment