For decades nationalists have languished as they attempt to answer the question “What can we do?”.
Political parties have been launched, mass movements have been tried, some have ventured into social media, and others have attempted to educate.
Some of these efforts have been successful. Keith Woods is a social media influencer with a very large audience, pro-White institutions such as American Renaissance garner significant financial support and hold regular conferences, and webzines such as Counter-Currents or The Anglofuturist have built up very significant audiences.
In Europe, nationalist figures and parties ranging from Björn Höcke of the AfD to the young Jordan Bardella of the National Rally (formerly the National Front) are in broad agreement with nationalist ideas and, seemingly, want to reverse the tide of the Great Replacement and fight back against the liberalism which brought it about.
Broad swatches of the American, Canadian, Australian, and European public believe in the reality of the Great Replacement, and politics in the West are beginning to reflect this.
67% of White Americans support the mass deportation of illegal aliens, Irish nationalists gained in local elections, and repatriation is a mainstream topic of conversation in France. Things are looking up for this movement, not least because it is the youth of the West making the biggest shift toward the right at the moment.
Pro-Trump material has double the engagement as pro-Biden material. In 2020 Biden led the youth by 23 points, right now he leads by just 8 points.
Farage far surpasses every other UK party and personality with his Tiktok engagement.
Reform UK (which Farage leads) is projected to win 12% of the 18-24 vote. The Tories might get 2% if they are lucky. Most interesting is that much of Farage's youth gain is taken from Labor, not the Tories.
AfD is the most popular party with young Germans, and it is because they dominate social media engagement in German language areas.
Bardella and Le Pen own the French Tiktok and broader social media scene. Le Pen's party is the most popular party with people under 34.
Media personalities such as Charlie Kirk, Alex Jones, Elon Musk, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens have all spoken quite openly about the Great Replacement because it is necessary to do so in order to retain a young right wing audience. An audience well aware that the root of most of their current problems lies in the great demographic transformations taking place.
I could go on, and on, and on about this social media shift. But its time to move onto my suggestions.
Clearly, nationalist, pro-White/pro-Western politics are beginning to win the day, but they are decidedly not winning over the elite. Governments continue to target, imprison, censor, and otherwise suppress nationalists. We have been forced off of most major platforms and we are given almost no spotlight in major media. Vetting firms are gatekeeping us from Reform UK or National Rally, even as their voter bases cry out for our brand of politics.
I am not here to complain, though. I am here to offer up a solution: Institutions.
My inspiration to start White Papers as a policy institute was driven by the incredible success of another policy wonk: Oren Cass.
Mr. Cass started his own think tank some years ago named American Compass. The institution, which raises only about 2 million dollars a year (as compared to the Heritage Foundation’s $100 million revenue) has radically transformed the economic debate on the right wing in the United States. The Heritage Foundation has largely abandoned free market fundamentalism in favor of protectionism and industrial planning, Conservative politicians have begun talking about organized labor with a positive tone for the first time in decades, and a broad agreement that immigration reduces wages has finally been reached on the right.
America Compass is the blueprint for White Papers, but this is but one institution that can only influence one part of the debate.
Nationalists everywhere need to begin creating serious, professional, well-mannered institutions that publish original research, lobby politicians, engage with the private sector, and make our ideas acceptable to sympathetic policymakers and moneymakers around the West.
We already have social media covered, there are a few policy institutes besides White Papers, and we create ample volumes of media.
What nationalism needs now are:
A Nationalist Federalist Society:
The Federalist Society, for those unaware, is a conservative/libertarian legal organization that advocates for specific (textualist and originalist) interpretations of the Constitution of the United States.
This organization, or rather its membership, has made it their mission to give conservative policymakers guidance on legal matters and names to appoint to state and federal courts. Trump picked almost all of his judicial nominees from Federalist Society suggestions, and most American governors do the same.
The United States was founded as an explicitly White country and for more than 175 years the laws of this nation explicitly and implicitly reflected this reality. Nationalists need to create a Legal Society dedicated to researching the history and spirit of these laws and advocating for Whites on that basis. We need lists of names to put forward to Governors and Presidents, and we need candidates who can run for local judgeships around the nation.
Political Action Committees (PACS):
Nationalists need PACs.
Everyone knows about them. From AIPAC to CPAC, to Priorities USA Action (the largest PAC of the Democrats)
Nationalists need PACs, each of which is pro-White and each of which focuses on a unique issue to Whites (immigration, crime, the opioid crisis, repatriation).
These PACs could serve to undermine those on the mainstream right and mainstream left by offering politicians who would be sympathetic to us the resources to be explicitly on our side. I am thinking of someone like Rep. Josh Schriver of the Michigan House of Representatives who speaks regularly of the Great Replacement but does so with confused rhetoric because he worries about losing party connections.
Then there are those no longer in office such as Steve King who, after speaking about the Great Replacement, was attacked by his own party, had his resources stripped, and lost his congressional seat.
We need PACs that cover everything from local school board races to races for State executives and Congressional seats. These PACs should be non-partisan, or exist for each party. It is, of course, more likely to influence Republicans, but there are still some deeply socially conservative blue regions of the country.
Service Based Non-Profits:
Nationalists need non-profits that provide goods, services, and opportunities to Whites.
I am aware of one gentleman building a scholarship fund, and I very much look forward to seeing what he is able to do with it! We need many more pioneering men and women who create similar institutions.
Wide areas of the country are impoverished, and we need charities to provide school supplies, food banks, clothing and more to Whites in need of help.
We need as many scholarship and educational funds as we can create to send hundreds and thousands of White students to school and university each year with the goal of becoming professionally educated White advocates and elites post graduation.
And before anyone protests the impossibility, plenty of race based scholarships already exist such as the scholarships offered by the Organization of Black Aerospace Professionals, or the Hispanic School Fund which has awarded more than $500 million in Scholarships to Hispanics in the United States since the 1970s.
If our efforts at pro-White educational attainment are taken before a court, the aforementioned Legal organization comes into play.
Media Watchdogs:
The mainstream has a great labrynth of media watchdogs ranging from Media Matters to FAIR, both of which function as mainstream left wing and right wing media watchdogs. There is also the ADL and SPLC, organizations which regularly condemn media organizations for their coverage of various issues.
A pro-White media watchdog would serve to ensure that expression of concern about race, crime, demographics, immigration and other concerns of Whites were given equal weight and treatment in the national media and social media landscapes. Nearly every racial group is looked after in this regard save for Whites.
An ecosystem:
We need many more organizations than the few I have listed off here. We need organizations which run museums, organizations which organize student trips to Europe, organizations that teach our history and something like a pro-White boy scouts. This could be especially popular considering that Boy Scouts has effectively been abolished.
The key is that all of these institutions come together and function as a mutually supporting ecosystem. They reinforce the message of seeking to better the social, economic, and policy standing of Whites and ultimately to pursue the political interest of Whites in the United States and abroad.
City councils should consider these institutions reputable enough to base policy off of, PACs should fund pro-White “tough on crime” judges recommended by the Legal Advocacy organization, and think tanks like White Papers should continue to make the public aware that the Great Replacement is an act being imposed upon Whites by bad policymaking and can be reversed.
There is a lot of work to do, and a lot more people who need to step into as of yet unfulfilled roles.
The public is getting here, and we need to build the institutions they are looking for.
Support White Papers’ mission to investigate and promote pro-White policies!
Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com
Buy us a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/wppi
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi
Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750
The only flaw in this entire article is the phrase, “…base policy off of…”. It should be “base policy on”. Base off of is an awkward and nonsensical phrase that should be banned from the vocabulary of every thinking and literate person.
Other than that tiny, tiny and inconsequential (though highly annoying) flaw, 100%. 💯