The Great Replacement is State Policy in Britain

There is documentation

When one says that the Great Replacement is state policy in any Britain, or any White country, most people will respond with a reaction that is best summed up with the word ‘duh.’ Yet, most people do not realize that a series of official documents and non-official sources back up this assertion.

The current trends on immigration were, like much of modern British politics, enshrined into law during the revolutionary government of Tony Blair. It is here that I must preempt those who will tell me that mass immigration and the cultural revolution began before Mr. Blair’s time in office, and this is true. Still, it is the Blair government that worked more diligently than any government before or after to ensure that the vision of a multicultural Britain would endure regardless of who next became prime minister.

This topic is also crucial in understanding why the current Labour government, and the Conservative governments that came before it (which were inherently Blairite in nature), crush any ethnic sentiment among the native British. Indeed, they crush it with violent force if and when they deem it necessary,

The first important document is a cabinet titled RDS Occasional Paper no. 67 which admits several interesting facts in the draft available:

1. Mass immigration will have, at best, a neutral effect on per capita income in the United Kingdom with no evidence of a positive impact.

2. Migrants will increase congestion imposing “direct costs” on native Britains and their businesses

3. That migrants will have access to the UK welfare state and may put a strain on it

This document is especially interesting because it was meant for circulation among government ministers and not to be released for general consumption even within Whitehall. Indeed, because of this, the document can admit to some of the potential failings of the mass immigration it is planning at the same time it is promoting the many supposed benefits. I could not help but notice that in the first several pages the government often uses the term “imagine” in the context of “imagined benefits” that immigration may bring to the country.

Still, we have not yet to touch on the most fascinating piece of history about RDS Occasional Paper no. 67 (OP67).

In 2012 former Blair advisor by the name of Andrew Neather penned an article for The Standard that delves into the history of OC67 and what the true intent of Blair’s immigration policy was meant to be. Mr. Neather reveals that earlier drafts of the paper explicitly spoke of using mass immigration to make the United Kingdom ‘truly multicultural’ and to rub the right’s nose in diversity. Mr. Neather also says that the report’s extensive talk of ‘social outcomes’ means social outcomes for immigrants and not for the native British population.

Along with this report came a litany of legislation under the Labour government of Tony Blair which opened Britain’s once closely guarded gates to the entire world. Three million immigrants were admitted to the country during Blair’s time in office and since then an additional 8 million have joined them under consecutive Conservative prime ministers.

Source: The Migration Observatory

The Conservatives’ contribution is not limited to merely continuing the policy of Labour, though. The Tories have fully embraced diversifying all sectors of British life and burying, as deeply as possible, the original culture and people that gave rise to Britain.

In a 2016 report rather ironically entitled The Culture White Paper the Tory government establishes a plan to use “Brand Britain” as a means of attracting trade and foreign investment while at the same time ensuring any reader that Brand Britain does not include space for the native British.

The report talks of establishing requirements that any funded bodies (organizations that receive government subsidies) to publish strategies for increasing diversity. The paper goes on to talk about establishing career pathways in cultural sectors to force as much of the private and non-profit sector as possible to embrace diversity while a few pages later the government talks about using public funding to ensure that the diversity of the country is reflected appropriately. This page is fittingly headlined by an image of what looks to be four Black violinists.

This phenomenon is not limited to mere reports or Labour Party action, though. It was revealed in 2021 that a Royal Air Force (RAF) squadron leader had issued orders to his staff to stop selecting “useless white male pilots” to take training courses while in 2022 the new head of the RAF, Sir Richard Knighton, was forced to apologize for the blatantly anti-White practices of his predecessor. What is interesting, though, is that Sir Knighton did not remove the RAF’s targets to be composed of a 40% female and 20% ethnic minority force by 2030.

The RAF is currently 85% Male and 95.5% White British and with no immediate plans to expand the number of soldiers in the force this means that tens of thousands of White male Britons will have to be forced out of the RAF to meet diversity targets. And this problem is not limited to the RAF.

A Ministry of Defense white paper published under the Conservative government and titled “A Force for Inclusion” lays out the government’s strategy for a diverse and inclusive armed forces by the year 2030 and it explicitly mentions recruitment, promotion, and leadership policies designed to make the British armed forces less White, less male, and less heterosexual.

Then there is the matter of the British police force(s), forces which are currently beating the daylights out of native Britons for protesting against the mass stabbing of little girls by a Rwandan.

The British government has an official policy, again put in place under Labour and expanded by the Conservatives, of radically increasing the number of non-Whites in the British police force. In many areas of the country, the government is notably failing to meet its non-White recruitment goals while in some of the Whitest/most native areas, the government is well exceeding its non-White recruitment targets.

BAME (ethnic minority) recruits are massively over-represented in North Yorkshire, North Wales, Northumbria, Sussex, Essex, and other parts of the country while they remain massively under-represented in large cities such as London, though targets are in place to markedly increase this figure.

Overall British policing remains a remarkably White and native British profession and the government makes it clear that it views this as a problem to be resolved.

It is here that I must ask why the government is particularly worried about resolving this issue when the police, with their lily White composition today, are currently out slamming British women against the pavement to be arrested for daring to protest against foreigners murdering British children.

I could go on for a rather long time listing out official government policy on removing White Britons from public life and continuing mass immigration, such as this policy paper from Boris Johnson’s government demanding the Crown Prosecution Service consider race, sexual orientation, and gender assignment when prosecuting criminals, but the list would exhaust the reader to the point of needing a coffee or perhaps a stimulant.

If the reader takes anything away from this piece it should be that the British government is ordering the bloody bludgeoning of native Britons because it is dedicated to their erasure from public life as a matter of policy.

---

Support White Papers’ mission to investigate and promote pro-White policies!

Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com

Buy us a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/wppi

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi

Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750