The American Repatriation Policy Platform

Reviving the Nation

By Mike Adams

The America of today looks nothing like our Founding Fathers intended. They would not recognize the foreign faces, languages, customs, and religions that have become all too commonplace in America’s cities and towns. These same revolutionaries who brought forth the American nation passed its first immigration act, the 1790 Naturalization Act. This act restricted immigration to the United States only to those free people of European descent who were of good character. This focus and preference for European immigrants persisted through to the Refugee Relief Act of 1953 which authorized the admission of 205,000 refugees from the European continent.

Today America looks quite different from 1953.

Americans never consented to our country being demographically transformed nor to our culture being ridiculed and targeted by our own government, media, and academia. Our politicians have responded to continued public displeasure over immigration by lying about the nature of their immigration policies, going all the way back to the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. Popularly known as the Hart-Celler Act, it was this legislation that began the process of demographically displacing the American nation within its own borders. The first draft of this now infamous bill was written by then Senator and eventual 35^th President John F. Kennedy. The final form of the bill was introduced to the House of Representatives by Emanuel Celler (Democrat-New York), the son of German-Jewish immigrants. Celler, who served for nearly 50 years in the House, voted against the Immigration Act of 1924 (which passed, and was signed by President Calvin Coolidge) but lived to see his own bill signed by LBJ.

In the period leading up to its passage the Hart-Celler Act received significant pushback from the American people and the country’s oldest ethnic organizations. The Daughters Of The American Revolution, the American Legion, the American Coalition of Patriotic Societies and other strongly ethnically American organizations all opposed the bill. In response to this opposition then Senator Ted Kennedy said:

“our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. ... Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset.”

Senator Kennedy was at best naïve and at worst lying to the American people about his bill. According to the Population Reference Bureau immigration to the United States averaged 250,000 per annum in the 1950s and 330,000 per annum in the 1960s. By the 1980s the Hart-Celler act had driven the number of immigrants to 735,000 a year and the average has topped one million immigrants annually since the 1990s.

As for the ethnic mix of our country—the ethnic mix that Kennedy assured Americans would never change … In 1965 the United States was roughly:

• 85% European and Ethnic American

• 11% Foundational Black American

• 4% Latino

• Less than 1% Asian

• Less than 1% American Indian

Fifty-five years later the 2020 census showed the United States to be:

• 57.84% European and Ethnic American

• 12.05% Black and Foundational Black American

• 18.73% Hispanic

• 6% Asian

• Less than 1% American Indian (single race)

• 4.60% Mixed/Some Other Race

As shocking as this demographic transformation is, the statistics are concealing yet larger demographic changes. Certain non-Western groups such as Jewish people and Middle Easterners are counted as White Americans by the Census Bureau despite these groups campaigning for their own census categories, a battle they recently won. Removing these groups from the White population as counted by the Census Bureau shows that the European and Ethnic American population is approximately 54% of the national demographic mix (utilizing the 2024 Census Bureau figures).

A similar phenomenon has befallen Foundational Black Americans (the descendants of slaves). Since 1965 the number of Black immigrants and their descendants has grown substantially so that today Black immigrants and their children comprise a 21% share of the Black population. This immigration wave has resulted in Foundational Black Americans’ share of the population shrinking to 10.58%.

Between 1965 and 2024 the traditional American population (European Americans and Foundational Black Americans) was driven down from a peak of 96% of the population of the United States to just 64.6% of the country’s population. A collapse of 31.4-points in just 55 years.

It was not only Senator Ted Kennedy who dissembled about the future of the United States under the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act. During a subcommittee hearing in the senate, it was Senator Hiram Fong (Republican-Hawaii) said who said of the Hart-Celler Act:

“Asians represent six-tenths of 1 percent of the population of the United States ... with respect to Japan, we estimate that there will be a total for the first 5 years of some 5,391 ... the people from that part of the world will never reach 1 percent of the population ... Our cultural pattern will never be changed as far as America is concerned.”

Whether or not Senator Fong truly believed his own words is trivial at this point. What is not trivial is that the Asian population—which he claimed would never exceed 1%—now exceeds 7.24% of the American population and numbers some 24 million individuals. Asians comprise nearly 30% of immigrants each year and by 2055 are expected to be the largest immigrant population in the country both in total numbers and yearly arrivals.

Worse yet, the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act and its proponents undermined the overwhelmingly native-born nature of the American population. From 1890 to 1970 the foreign-born population of the United States fell from a peak of 14.8% to a low of 4.7% in 1970. In the year 1970 only 9.62 million foreign-born people lived in the United States and the overwhelming majority of these immigrants (some 90%) were from Europe. Since 1970 the population of immigrants has surged and as of October of 2023 the foreign-born share of the American population reached 15.2%, the highest it has ever been. The Center of Immigration Studies reports the immigrant population in the United States has reached an all-time high of 49.5 million people.

345 years of supermajority European immigration (1620-1965) to the United States was overturned by a bill that the political class was forced to dissemble about in order overcome the scrutiny of the American public.

The American public was right to be skeptical. A September 2015 study by the Pew Research Center found that had the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act never been passed the demographic shifts in the United States would have been far less sever. The European and Ethnic American share of the population would have declined from 85% in 1960 to 75% by 2015 while the Black and Foundational Black American population would have increased from 11% to 14%. The Hispanic population would have doubled from 4% to 8%, overwhelmingly fueled by non-immigrant Hispanic groups such as Tejanos, Californios, and Hispanos. Instead, the Hart-Celler act went into effect against the wishes of the American and the European and Ethnic American share of the population collapsed by 35-points over the proceeding 55 years.

Since the passage of this disastrous legislation, the American public has constantly voted for less immigration, border walls, more deportations, and an end to unchecked mass immigration. These policy changes may indeed come, and the second Trump administration has certainly made strides curtailing immigration, but the historic injustice against the American nation that is mass immigration cannot be corrected by immigration restriction alone. If the American people are ever to receive justice we must demand that the process of demographic change, in part, be reversed through a policy of repatriation.

For this reason, and as part of an ongoing project to produce more remigration platforms as started by my colleague Joseph Bright, I have decided to combine White Papers extensive archive of repatriation policies and my own proposals into a cohesive American Repatriation Policy Platform (ARPP).

Do Americans want this? Americans are rapidly becoming disillusioned with multiculturalism and demographic change. Between September of 2019 and September of 2024, the number of Americans who view diversity as a threat to American culture more than tripled from 11% to 33%. This figure rises to 35% among Whites and 43% among non-college educated Whites. An Ipsos poll released one day before Trump’s 2025 inauguration found that 66% of Americans support deporting all people who are in the country illegally. This is a 12-point increase from a September 2024 Ipsos poll which found that 54% of Americans support mass deportations. It is also a 4% increase from a June 2024 poll which showed 62% of Americans, including 67% of White Americans and 53% of Hispanic Americans, support mass deportations.

The moral backing of the American people, of all backgrounds, already exists to undertake the proposed Mandatory Repatriation Policies (MRPs) to remove anyone who has broken American law to come to the United States, this reality should and must be shouted from every rooftop.

It is essential that this platform in part or in whole inspires America’s increasingly patriotic and nationalist policymakers to begin undoing the demographic changes that the Great Replacement and accompanying mass immigration have brought to the United States.

The repatriation policies will be split into two categories:

1. Mandatory Repatriation Policies (MRPs), to ensure the denaturalization and deportation of illegal immigrants, criminals, and immigrant fraudsters. In short, those without the moral or legal right to live in the United States.

2. Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs), to work in close cooperation with those minority groups and individuals who want to leave the country and need support to do so. A crucial step to reversing the Great Replacement.

In keeping with the original Great Repatriation series, the American Repatriation Policy Platform (ARPP) proposes that the process of repatriation take place over a period of twelve years. This timeframe gives the government, both federal and state, time to properly plan for the large movements of people involved in deportation and repatriation. Those people who wish to voluntarily repatriate to their homelands will also require time to plan, pack, sell their US based assets, and prepare their new homes abroad. This twelve-year timespan will permit many repatriates the ability to carefully consider their relocation and to seek out appropriate assistance in doing so. Finally, the twelve-year timeframe provides the government(s) the ability to spread the fiscal burden over a longer period and will allow for spending adjustments where necessary.

Mandatory Repatriation Policies (MRPs)

Deporting All Illegal Immigrants: The Trump administration has made great strides in the deportation of criminal illegal aliens, but a truly nationalist American government or policymaker cannot consider the job complete by focusing only on the (violent) criminal element of the illegal alien population. According to the Homeland Security Committee’s recent report there are roughly 650,000 criminal illegal aliens in the United States. These illegal criminals represent a remarkably small portion of the overall population of illegal aliens, a population that numbers in the many millions and which has an outsized effect on America’s demography.

According to preliminary estimates by the Center of Immigration Studies (CIS) the illegal immigrant population had reached 14 million people by September of 2024. The CIS director went on to stress that this figure is likely an underestimate given available (and incomplete) Census Bureau information. Combining this figure with the 2024 Census Bureau figures gives us a total resident population of 344.1 million people, an increase of 12.53 million since the 2020 census and one which reflects, in part, the massive surge of illegal aliens into the United States.

A recent study by the Manhattan Institute found that the lifetime fiscal cost of these new illegal aliens will be a staggering $1.15 trillion while the Center for Immigration Studies estimates the lifetime cost of these illegal aliens will place a burden of $595 billion upon American taxpayers, with each illegal alien taking up $68,000 in American tax dollars over the course of his life.

This cost is significantly higher than the $315 billion price tag that the left-wing American Immigration Council put on a theoretical mass deportation operation to remove all illegal immigrants from the country.

The American state can certainly make these deportations happen. Operation Wetback began in 1954 with just 750 immigration officers and some 300 vehicles, seven planes and handful of boats. Yet, in the course of just a year, some 1.1 million immigration enforcement actions were undertaken. Roughly half of these were ‘hands on’ deportations, or border agents loading illegal immigrants and others into buses, planes and boats. Another 500,000 were illegals departing of their own volition, mostly because they were aware they would be arrested and deported anyway.

Compare these resources to the Federal government of today. The Department of Homeland Security has more than 260,000 employees, the federal government has more than 7,700 buses, and more than a thousand transport aircraft maintained by the Department of Defense.

Deportation enforcement is not the only way to remove illegal aliens, though. The federal government could compel the departure of nearly all illegal aliens by mandating that all state, local, and municipal governments who receive federal funding mandate that:

• All private employers must utilize the E-Verify system to check the legal status and work eligibility of any potential employee

• That all levels of government utilize the Systematic Alien Verification For Entitlements (SAVE) system to check the welfare, license, credential, and background eligibility of any person interacting with the government.

The fact that mandatory use of E-Verify and SAVE is not already the law has been a decades long story of negligence and willful ignorance by the American elite, and it is a policy that must change. The political class are not the only people to ignore the illegal status of individuals, though.

Employers who ignore these proposed policies will also need to be made an example of so that companies are not compelled to ignore the E-Verify rules. To do this lawmaker must focus on the Reagan Amnesty, the 1986 IRCA. This act contains a provision which makes it near impossible for prosecutors and Federal officials to take businesses to court whom employ illegal immigrants. This section (Section B) should and must be replaced, but this issue could be tackled more immediately by the executive. The Attorney General could have the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel issue a new opinion which more strictly reinterprets the provision to allow the prosecution of businessowners who employ illegal immigrants.

The President should then begin the process of firing all 93 Federal US Attorneys, which he is empowered to do at his discretion. The administration would then start filling these vacancies with new US Attorneys who will uphold the interpretative changes of the Attorney General. These policy changes combined with a slate of judicial appointments will also be necessary for the second and third MRPs.

Denaturalizing the Children and Family of Illegal Aliens: According to a Pew Research Center study some 4.4 million children in the United States have illegal alien parents, while 1.3 million US-born adults live with their illegal alien parents, and a further 3 million lawful immigrants reside in a household with illegal immigrants. The children of illegal immigrants are hardly real Americans while immigrants who knowingly harbor illegal aliens are violating American law.

All 4.4 million children with illegal alien must be denaturalized and prevented from reentering the United States upon reaching adulthood. Currently these children can be deported with alongside their parents, but that process does not revoke their US citizenship and without revocation they will be able to reenter the country upon turning 18.

As this policy proposal is being written the Trump administration is gearing up for a Supreme Court battle that is likely to do away with citizenship for the future children of illegal aliens and temporary immigrants. If the Supreme Court indeed sides with the administration the ruling would open the possibility for the president and or Congress to conclude that what is no longer constitutional was never constitutional.

Then there are the US-born adult children of illegal immigrants. These US citizens, having reached adulthood and being responsible for their own lives, should not be stripped of their citizenship wholesale. Instead, policymakers should target those adult children of illegal aliens who continue to aid and abet the presence of illegals in the country.

Any adult child of an illegal immigrant who continues to live with and or support an illegal alien presence in the country can either:

A. Be charged under Title 8, U.S.C. Section 1324 (a) for transporting, concealing, and harboring unauthorized aliens, or;

Agree to renounce their American citizenship in exchange for a full pardon on the abovementioned offenses and a taxpayer funded plane ticket to their country of ancestral origin.

Constructed in this fashion the policy would only affect the 1.3 million US-born adult children of illegal aliens who continue to reside with an illegal alien in their household. The remaining 5-or-so million adult children of illegal aliens who do not reside with an illegal alien would not be affected and would retain their US citizenship.

As for the three million legal immigrants knowingly residing with an illegal alien, their visas and Green Cards can be cancelled for violations of Title 8. The immigrants would then be required to either depart the United States of their own volition or face arrest and deportation.

In total this policy might result in as many as 8.7 million recent immigrants and their children could be denaturalized or stripped of their visas and made to leave the United States in conjunction with the illegal alien family members or parents they decided to harbor in violation of American law and values.

Denaturalizing the Frauds and Deporting Green Card Holders: An American passport must have value and should not be handed out haphazardly. Due to poor enforcement and a disinterest in curtailing immigration the American bureaucracy has ushed many immigrants into permanent residency status and citizenship. This process often ignores chains of fraud or utilizes interpretive loopholes opened by vagueness in laws enacted by Congress to allow in as many immigrants as possible. The most common form of non-welfare immigration fraud are false marriages, with a rate of abuse ranging from 10 to 30 percent depending on the source cited. In other cases immigrants have claimed to be abused by their US citizen children in order to gain permanent resident status while more often immigrants simply lie about having criminal records.

Still, these frauds pale in comparison to the astounding levels of welfare abuse that state and federal government(s) have allowed by refusing to label immigrant welfare users as “public charges” despite having the power to do so.

Title 8, chapter 11, subchapter 2, part 2, section 1182 of the United States code states: “Any alien who, in the opinion of the consular officer at the time of application for a visa, or in the opinion of the Attorney General at the time of application for admission or adjustment of status, is likely at any time to become a public charge is inadmissible.”

Currently only three rarely granted forms of federal cash assistance are considered when deciding if an immigrant constitutes a “public charge”. Food stamps, Medicaid, section 8 housing assistance, and other welfare usage are not counted as making an illegal alien a public charge despite the fact any regular American would believe that persons dependent upon these programs (and therefore American tax dollars) are a burden on the public purse. This gap between the expectations of the public and the poor enforcement of Title 8 Chapter 11 must change and the 50.2% of naturalized immigrants who use welfare must be denaturalized on account of their being dependent upon the American taxpayer, a reality that should have prevented their naturalization in the first instance.

Some 12.55 million naturalize citizens in the United States are utilizing welfare programs that American law, in spirit, forbids them from using. These naturalized citizens must be denaturalized and deported from the United States in order to take the burden of supporting their lifestyles off the shoulders of the American people.

This same policy initiative of expelling those on welfare can also be extended to millions Green Card holders (permanent residents) who have abused the American welfare state against the spirit of Title 8 and the expectations of the American people. According to the same CIS study cited above some 53.9% of non-citizen households, or about 7 million of the 12.8 million current Green Card holders, utilize American welfare programs.

The first Trump administration attempted to change public charge inadmissibility rules so that immigrants utilize food stamps, Medicaid, and public housing assistance would be considered as “public charges” and therefore made ineligible to remain in the United States, unfortunately this policy did not take effect until the very end of 2021 and was reversed months later by the Biden administration.

The positive note is that we know these reforms can implemented via executive fiat. Reinstating the public charge reforms of the first Trump administration and aggressively prosecuting those who become US citizens whole receiving welfare dollars could result in the deportation and expulsion of some 19.55 million legal immigrants and naturalized citizens who violated the spirit of American law and the expectations of the American people.

There have also been other mass frauds. The 1986 IRCA, known as the Reagan Amnesty, had a fraud rate as high as 70% according to the to several studies while a 2008 refugee family reunification program run by the State Department had a fraud rate upwards of 80%. This cannot stand and while it is impossible to predict how many people could be denaturalized because of these frauds we can say that it is a line of investigation that should be resolutely pursued.

Reducing and Restricting the Temporary Immigrant Population: Temporary legal immigrants are among the simplest demographics to deal with. According to the Pew Research Center some 5 million legal temporary immigrants currently reside in the United States with 3 million of those immigrants being beneficiaries of the Biden Administration’s abuse of temporary protected status.

Given the president’s extensive authority over how many immigrants and what type of immigrants may be admitted to the United States the legal immigrant population can be decreased over time by simply restricting the number of new visas issued to potential immigrants. Through executive action the president can, and must, bar immigration from non-Western countries and implement travel bans wherever justifiable. In this way executive action can be used to severely limit the number and type of third world immigrants coming to the United States and establish a preference for Western immigrants. All the while the temporary status of current legal immigrants will expire, and they will be required to leave the United States or face deportation.

Cutting Ties With Puerto Rico: Puerto Rico is little more than a vestigial colonial possession of the United States dating back to the end of the Spanish-American war. The island has a distinct language (Spanish), distinct faith (Catholicism), and distinct national and ethnic identities that are not shared with the ethnic American nation. This distinction between nations has even been recognized by the US Supreme Court which ruled in the 1901 case of Downes V. Bidwell that Puerto Rico is “inhabited by alien races, differing from us in religion, customs, laws, methods of taxation and modes of thought … “

Despite these differences 5.9 million Puerto Ricans have settled in the mainland United States without the consent of the American people. In fact, a majority of Americans (52%) are supportive of Puerto Rican independence according to a YouGov poll. While in mainland Puerto Rico the local independence party, the PIP, received the second largest share of votes in the 2024 Puerto Rican general election, only 9 points behind the leading New Progressive Party.

It is time, therefore, that Puerto Rico and the United States go their separate ways and pursue their respective national destinies, a policy that has been outlined by White Papers extensively in the past.

The United States Congress must first eject Puerto Rico from the union and cut off the flow of migrants from the island to the mainland United States. The American government should then move to repeal Public Law 600 of 1950 and the preceding Foraker Act. By repealing these pieces of legislation the United States would denaturalize all Puerto Ricans both on the island and present within the continental United States, but Puerto Ricans would retain their Puerto Rican citizenship as defined in the island’s own laws. The Puerto Rican State Department issues certificates of Puerto Rican citizenship to any Puerto Rican who was born on the island, has ever been subject to its jurisdiction, and to those Puerto Ricans born beyond the island’s shores who have at least one Puerto Rican parent.

This process of separation is also supported by Puerto Rican nationalists. The PIP website features a page on the diaspora which focuses on a range of policy options to bring stateside Puerto Ricans home to contribute to their homeland rather than a foreign country (the United States).

By cutting ties with Puerto Rico the American people could denaturalize and deport 5.9 million non-Americans from the country with relative ease all while lessening the fiscal burden on the country and substantially reducing crime, poverty, and tax transfers.

The process of investigating, denaturalizing, and deporting those immigrants and their descendants who have deceived, defrauded, or otherwise unjustly abused the American people and our nation could result in up to 50.18 million deportations.

Roughly 38.55 million of these deportees and repatriates would be people of first-generation immigrant origin who came to the United States from their home countries. Another 5.7 million people would be the under-18-year-old children and adult children of illegal aliens who were born in the United States but continue to reside with their illegal alien parents. The final 5.9 million departures would consist of the denaturalized Puerto Ricans returning to their island homeland.

The implementation of these Mandatory Repatriation Policies would see the immigrant population of the United States fall from its current peak of 49.5 million to some 11 million people, most of whom would be of European and Asian origin. These population reductions would also result in the European and Ethnic American share of the population increase by roughly 9.2-points to a share of 63.2% of the overall population.

Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs):

While Mandatory Repatriation Policies (MRPs) contribute significantly to restoring the primacy of the American nation they will be unable to fully address the post-1965 demographic changes. After implementation of the MRPs there will be another 112 million people who are, reportedly, outside the bounds ethnic American identity. Many of these millions will be connected to the country through mixed parentage, American Indian heritage, or simple patriotism. These individuals will not be asked to leave. Still, research shows that there are tens of millions of people in the United States who do wish to relocate abroad. It is this group, those who want to go, that the Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs) will seek to empower and enable through a combination of financial and logistical assistance.

First it is key to identify those people who will not be the focus of the Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs).

American Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islanders: According to the 2020 Census there are 3.72 million single-race American Indians in the United States, this figure also includes the Native Alaskan peoples. Across the country there are 715,000 Americans who identify as Native Hawaiians while a further 872,000 Pacific Islanders reside in the country, most of whom have mixed parentage with Asian or European admixture.

In total there are 5.3 million American Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Americans who have deep and abiding connections to the country. Instead of deportation (there is nowhere to repatriate American Indians) White Papers has long recommended a policy of maximizing American Indian autonomy.

Pretendians: A portmanteau of Indian and Pretend, the term Pretendian was created to describe the large population of White Americans who have begun to identify as partly American Indian. According to Circe Sturm, a professor of anthropology at the University of Texas at Austin, the 86.5% rise in the Native American population between the 2010 census and the 2020 census is largely explained by White Americans shifting their single-race identity to a mixed-race identity. Of his research Sturm says:

“In my interviews with race shifters, for example, they frequently associated their former whiteness with racial and cultural emptiness.”

Professor Sturm goes on to explain that these White pretending to be American Indians associate their Whiteness with social isolation, unearned privilege, and guilt over colonialism and slavery. In nationalist parlance: Whites are pretending to be Indian to escape the modern anti-White attitudes and teaching that permeate American society.

For these reasons it is safe to assume that the 3.5 million people who were added to the mixed race White-American Indian category on the 2020 census are in fact overwhelmingly of European descent and therefore will not be a focus of the Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs).

White Hispanics: A poorly defined group in the American consciousness that is often responsible for skewed statistics and unclear data, White Hispanics fall outside of the common understanding of race and ethnicity for most Americans. Census data reports of there being 31.5 million White Hispanics in the United States are easily dismissed, as these are self-identifications, and the number of self-identified White Hispanics has been decreasing with each consecutive census as identifying as White falls out of fashion.

Still, White Hispanics are a real and numerous demographic in the United States, and one the country should seek to retain. 20.3% of Hispanics identify as wholly ethnically European while a further 21% of Hispanics in the United States are Protestants. These 12.6 million White Hispanics are more likely to speak English at home, often intermarry with ethnic Americans, and should be encouraged to remain in the United States, continue their already substantial integration into ethnic American society, and will not, therefore, be a group of focus for Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs).

Other Mixed Americans: The final group that will not be a focus for Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs). Mixed Americans are a diverse group including White-Asian mixed Americans—about 2.86 million people—and Americans of three-to-four ethnic heritages who number about 2.55 million individuals. Some of these individuals may still be compelled to leave the United States, but the VRPs will not focus on encouraging them to do so.

We can reasonably estimate that 85.2 million people will fall under the focused lens of the Voluntary Repatriation Policies (VRPs). A population overwhelmingly of non-Western extraction with a mix of historic and recent ties to the United States.

Voluntary Paid Repatriation: According to a study conducted by Monmouth University in 2024 some 45% of People of Color in the United States would move abroad and settle in a foreign country if they were “free to do so” with the figure increasing to 51% among people aged 18 to 34. Other studies and publications also show that significant portions of People of Color in the United States wish to depart the country. Tourism agency data on African American visitors to Ghana (a country that actively courts the diaspora) reveals that 30% of African Americans who visit the continent either have relocated or wish to relocate to Africa permanently. On the opposite side of the world data published by PEW in 2023 revealed that 26-30 percent of Asians in the United States would consider relocating to their ancestral homelands.

Among yet more specific groups the desire to move abroad is greater still. El Salvadoran president Nayib Bukele’s government has stated that 62% of Salvadorans in the United States want to return to their homeland. His government has also put policies in place to help enable their repatriation.·

The cornerstone of paid voluntary repatriation is a proposed $72,000 repatriation payment to be made to each repatriate who agrees to leave the country and renounce their US citizenship. This $72,000 dollar figure was calculated by adding 50% ($24,000) to the media American disposable income of $48,000 per annum.

A single repatriation payment represents 12 years of median disposable earnings in Mexico, 3.5 years of median earnings in Japan, and 33 years of income in Ghana. With an average family size of four the typical Black or Hispanic family would leave the United States with $288,000 in the bank, more than enough money to buy a home in a foreign land. An average home in Mexico costs just $90,000 dollars while in Ghana $85,000 to $100,000 can buy a modern, newly constructed, three bedroom home in the heart of the capital region of Accra.

The paid repatriation program would also cover:

• The cost of flights

• Visa and administrative fees

• Cover any taxes and import duties for shipping household goods and possessions abroad

• Allow repatriates to permanently retain a US bank account to protect against local currency fluctuations

• Establish a network of private and non-profit agencies to navigate the bureaucracies of foreign countries

• The cancellation of up to $50,000 in debt held by American institutions

• Any repatriate over the age of 35 will retain the right to collect limited Social Security and Medicaid benefits upon eligibility.

Voluntary Unpaid Repatriation: Not every emigrant and repatriate will require or should necessarily be eligible for a repatriation payment. 10-12% of repatriates will be in the upper income brackets (above $150,000) while others will retain remote jobs that may enable them to forego taking the repatriation payments.

Aside from a lack of a reparation payment, the unpaid repatriation program will retain the same benefits from help navigating and planning relocations to the cancellation of debts. The government would also work with American corporations to ensure that unpaid repatriates have a higher change of retaining remote work through American corporations and opportunities to work with US embassies on American business ventures abroad would be another perk for those wealthy enough to forego the paid repatriation route.

How many will go? Based upon the estimate from Monmouth University policymakers should expect 45 to 51 percent of those of non-Western origin would depart the United States. In absolute terms this represents between 38.34 million and 43.45 million people. Roughly 18.36 million individuals would be of Foundational Black American stock, many of whom travel to and wish to relocate to Africa already—a development White Papers has covered in numerous articles.

Combined with the 50.18 million people that the Mandatory Repatriation Policies (MRPs) would see denaturalized or deported it is probable that the American Repatriation Policy Platform would see the denaturalization, deportation, and repatriation of 93.63 million people. This would reduce the American population from its current 2023 peak of 344.1 million to roughly 250.27 million people.

The ARPP would be implemented over the twelve-year time frame with roughly 7.8 million departures taking place per annum with the overwhelming majority of those departures being voluntary and incentivized rather than forced deportations.

As the ARPP comes to an end the demographics of the United States will have shifted quite significantly back toward their historic average. The ethnic American population will increase from its current 54 % share of the population to a 75.5% share of the population—a 21.5-point increase. The overall Western share of the population, counting ethnic Americans, White Hispanics, and mixed-Americans, will increase to 81.7% of the national populous, thereby restoring the United States to its historic demographic balance.

African Americans would represent 7.4% of the population, other mixed Americans would comprise roughly 1% of the population, and American Indians would comprise 1.5% of the population. The remaining 10% of the population would be comprised of a mix of Asian and Hispanic Americans, especially long-standing non-immigrant Hispanic groups such as the Californios, Hispanos, and Tejanos who were established in their respective states before the American pioneers conquered those territories. The overall Hispanic population, counting White identifying Hispanics with all others, would stand at 8.8%, precisely the share the Pew center estimated Hispanics would have held had the Hart-Celler act never passed Congress.

How much will this cost? The answer, roughly 3.6 trillion dollars or 300 billion dollars each year for the 12 years of the ARPP’s proposed existence. This covers Mandatory and Voluntary Repatriation Policies, administration, and travel. This is a staggering sum of money, but it must be put into context and measured up against the current levels of spending that the failed multicultural experiment has imposed on the American people.

To tally up but a few line items from the 2023 government budget(s) and generously assuming per capita spending is equal across races:

· $67 billion on housing assistance, 75.6% of which went to minorities ($50.65 billion).

· $166.3 billion on nutrition assistance programs, 60.2% of which went to minorities ($100 billion).

· $871.7 billion in Medicaid spending, 60.5% of which went to minorities ($527.4 billion).

· $182 billion on prisons, policing, and incarceration related activities, 69% of prisoners were of a minority background ($125.58 billion).

· $80.5 billion each year to educate the children of illegal aliens.

· $14.4 billion in grants, contracts, and other financial assistance to Puerto Rico.

Just these five items of public spending are costing the American taxpayer some $898 billion dollars each year, three times the annual proposed cost of the American Repatriation Policy Platform (ARPP). The costs of supporting to increasingly diverse population of the United States will be perpetual in nature and ever-increasing in dollar terms unless and until a serious policy of repatriation is enacted. Put another way, the American nation cannot afford to ignore the necessity of repatriation.

By implementing the 12-year ARPP the future tax burden of the American nation could be cut down significantly and allow these fiscal resources to be redeployed to infrastructure, education, and most crucially into private hands to grow the American economy.

The American economy would also remain the largest in the world even after the implementation of the ARPP. Removing the entirety of the Hispanic buying power of $3.4 trillion in 2023,Black buying power of $976.5 billion in 2022, and Asian spending power at $1.6 trillion in 2024 the American economy would still be $21.4 trillion in size, or $3.6 trillion larger than the Chinese economy in 2023.

Finally, we ask you, the American reader, to imagine a country with 93 million fewer residents straining the roads, prisons, schools, and housing market. A country with public spending levels far below their current historic highs.

Support White Papers:

Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi

Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750