Pro-White Immigration Policies

We must replace the old with the new

A nation is by definition an exclusive entity. Nations are composed, overwhelmingly, of members born to it by current and previously living members. This exclusivity preserves the cultural, genetic, historical, and political heritage of nations and allows them to persist into the future. When a nation comes under demographic, political, or economic threat it tends to respond in an attempt to correct the problem - and White nations are only just beginning to grasp the full scope of the demographic problem facing the West.

White Papers has long encouraged repatriation, remigration, and deportation as the beginning of a necessary process to reverse the demographic decline that is currently gripping Western civilization. When White countries begin to dismantle their current immigration systems and start the process of repatriation they will require new immigration systems to replace the old neoliberal systems that serve as the root of the problem.

New immigration systems will, by necessity, vary quite significantly by country. Some White nations have large diasporas to call upon, while others have culturally similar neighbors or former colonies they can look to. Some countries, namely the United States, have a long history of successful cultural integration and influence to pick only the best immigrants Western civilization has to offer.

Mother Countries:

Some White countries have globe-spanning diaspora that retain strong cultural connections to their ancestral homelands or a sense of ethnic identity rooted in their group experiences with emigration to new lands.

Ireland is perhaps the best example to look to. Currently, Ireland is suffering from incredible state-sponsored demographic change that is filling the country with dangerous, unvetted, and unwanted, foreigners from the third world. Irish children have been stabbed in the street by an Algerian immigration. Meanwhile, the foreign-origin rapists who attack Irish women are released on bail so they may continue terrorizing the native population.

The Irish must first reverse the trends of the Great Replacement in their country by expelling the foreign-born population and illegal immigrants (including current ‘refugees’). Citizenship must be stripped from criminal, anti-Irish, and fraudster foreigners who have settled in Ireland and the entire lot must be expelled from the country. But what comes next?

If Ireland truly needs some level of immigration to help power its economy then the nation can, and should, pull from its incredibly large and well-qualified diaspora.

For example, there are 9.9 million wholly Irish heritage Americans (Gael-Mheiriceánaigh). Some 32% of these Irish Americans possess a university degree and many are professionals employed in management or office settings (40%). 8% of Irish Americans work in the trades and 9% work in the productive (industrial sector).

Irish Americans are also wealthier than their counterparts in Ireland. The average Irish household will bring in $41,891 in income in a given year, while the average Irish American household income will top $56,000 per annum.

Another 4.6 million Irish heritage individuals live in Canada, while 2.4 million Australians and 800,000 New Zealanders claim a majority Irish heritage. Tens of millions more people of partial Irish ancestry reside in these countries, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

If a post-Great Replacement Ireland is still in need of hundreds of thousands of immigrants (which is doubtful) it can pull from its very large, very wealthy, and very well-educated diaspora. This will preserve the nation and reconnect the diaspora with their ancestral homeland in a way that current mass immigration could never achieve.

Norway is another example of a country with an extensive, well-qualified, and wealthy diaspora it could call upon to fill any serious labor or social gaps.

Norway, like Ireland, is a small country with a modest population of just 5.5 million. The wholly Norwegian population of the country is just 4.031 million while the immigrant population and their descendants top 1.15 million individuals. Some 45.5% of these immigrants, or 542,229 people, are of non-Western (largely non-White) extraction.

These immigrants also cost Norwegian taxpayers, dearly. Each non-White immigrant to the country will, over their lifetime, cost the Norwegian taxpayer some 4.1 million Norwegian crowns or $371,700 US dollars. This is sharply contrasted to educated White immigrants from Western countries who are net contributors to the Norwegian system over the course of their lifetime.

In contrast, the Norwegian diaspora is large, wealthy, and well-educated.

There are some 3.9 million Norwegian-descended Americans (Norskamerikanere), with 1.23 million claiming 100% Norwegian extraction. Norwegian Americans have maintained their Lutheran faith, continue to celebrate Norway’s Constitution Day, and have founded countless cultural and educational institutions which celebrate both their American homeland and Norwegian ancestry.

Hundreds of thousands more Norwegian-descended individuals reside in Canada, Australia, and other Nordic countries. If Norway is truly in need of 542,229 immigrants it would be better served replacing its largely dependent non-White population with 542,229 proud members of the Norwegian diaspora.

This policy of diaspora-based immigration applies to the vast bulk of Europe.

Poland, a nation with a rapidly aging population, is importing hundreds of thousands of people from the third world each year to make up for this worker shortage. Rather than importing masses of culturally alien immigrants Poland should be courting the roughly 20 million ethnic Poles who currently reside outside the country.

Similar States and Diaspora Nations:

Unlike the Irish or Norwegian emigrants who resettled in established nations the British people founded and populated several nations that retain, to this day, a strong British or British-inspired character and populations composed largely of British-descended individuals.

Australia, Canada, and New Zealand retain not only cultural and ethnic ties to the United Kingdom but also political ties through a shared monarchy, set of religious institutions, and language.

Nearly 50 million people of whole or partial British ancestry populate Britain’s former colonies or neighboring nations in Europe. While a further 90 million people in the United States lay claim to membership in the formative WASP stock which underpins American culture and nationhood.

Britain, and the countries that remain constitutionally and culturally linked to her, would be better served by establishing a freedom of movement zone between them so that skilled (ethnically) British labor could move between countries without hindrance.

Consideration might also be given to expanding this freedom of movement zone to other majority English-speaking and ethnically similar nations such as Ireland, Malta, and the United States. Special provisions might also be made for the 1.6 million people of English ancestry in South Africa so that they may return to Britain (or another country in the freedom of movement zone) where they won’t be a hated minority such as they are in modern South Africa.

France can look to the several distinct nations that its’ colonial empire brought about. However, they are not nations that currently possess sovereignty in the same way that Britain’s former dominions do today.

The most well-known of these French-derived nations is doubtless Quebec. The French-speaking Quebec, which is governed by a national assembly and not a provincial parliament, boasts a population of more than 2.15 million people who identify themselves as ethnically French and a further 4+ million people in the province lay claim to some French ancestry and speak French as their primary language.

Another 2 million people, largely spread across Canada and the United States claim membership in the Acadian (Acadien) nation. More than 300,000 people in Canada speak Acadian French while an additional 300,000 people in Louisiana, an American state, speak a local dialect of French which was imported when the Acadians were expelled from their colony by the British and resettled in the region.

Additionally, there are 6.4 million Americans who claim some degree of French ancestry with more than 1.5 million claiming to be of entirely French extraction. Similarly, Canada boasts more than a million additional French speakers outside of Quebec.

If, after France repatriates the great majority of its 13+ million non-White non-Western immigrants and their descendants, the French nation feels that it is still in need of immigrants to prop up its national economy it should look to the nearly 16 million members of its diaspora, many of whom speak French, for such immigrants.

The Case of America:

And finally, there is the case of the United States, a nation that has been convinced it is a “nation of immigrants” and that it has always been diverse.

The American nation, that is the White population that founded and underpins the country, is a remarkably un-diverse group. 52% of the roughly 195 million European Whites in the United States originate from the British Isles, a geographic area smaller than the state of New Mexico or less than half the size of Texas. Once Dutch and German Americans are included in the mix it becomes clear that 80+ percent of the White American population originates from an area of Europe roughly double the size of Texas and with remarkably little genetic or religious variation.

The vast bulk of these descendants of Europe remain protestants and share very similar cultural outlooks. They have integrated most of the Nordic, Italian, and Greek Americans into the majority American culture and created a remarkably cohesive White nation defined more by its domestic regionalism than by the various European groups that have come to settle it.

This integration continues today. Roughly 21% of Hispanics in the United States identify as Protestant while 20.3% of Hispanics identify as wholly ethnically European. These 12.6 million Whites from Latin America make up the majority share of Hispanic Protestants in the country and it is not only their religion that aligns with the majority White population. The small number of truly White Hispanics also have politics that align with the White majority. They vote, overwhelmingly, for Republicans and they are very dedicated to concepts such as Christian nationalism, an ideology also popular with the majority of White Evangelical Protestants.

These White Hispanics are much more likely to speak English at home and many of them intermarry with the heritage White population of the United States. In fact, almost half of ‘interracial’ marriages in the United States are between heritage White Americans and White Hispanics and are not truly interracial.

All of this is to say that the American nation, a White nation, is remarkably adept at integrating other Whites into the majority WASP culture. This propensity to integrate other Whites into the majority nation should inform future post-repatriation immigration policy in the same way that it informed previous American immigration policy.

From 1790, starting with America’s first immigration act (the 1790 Naturalization Act) until the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 the United States maintained a race-based immigration system. Then from 1952 to 1965, the US maintained a quota system that continued to admit migrants from the European continent, though the legislation did expand quotas for European countries outside of the traditional Western European sphere.

For 120 years from 1850 until the 1970s America’s immigrant population never exceeded a 14.8% share of the national population. By 1970 just 4.7% of the population, about 9.7 million people, were recent immigrants.

The American nation would be best served by returning to this regional quota system and allowing in immigrants according to the historic demographic composition of the American nation. This would mean that the overwhelming majority of any immigrants the country takes would be from the Western part of Europe and in particular from the British Isles, the Benelux countries, and Germany.

The United States should return to the 1950s average of admitting roughly 250,000 immigrants per annum. These immigrants, overwhelmingly from Western Europe or other British-descended nations, should be selected based on their skills (either academic or trades related) and the family reunification policy should be tightened significantly so that only the wives and minor children of these immigrants can relocate to the United States. This would put a stop to the modern trend of chain migration we see today where nearly 75% of immigrants arrive as family members of previous immigrants and many of them are the parents, adult siblings, nieces, nephews, and even cousins of previously admitted immigrants.

Conclusion:

America has, for the better part of 60 years taken in the poor, tired, and huddled masses of the third world. These masses of culturally and ethnically alien peoples have been haphazardly bolted onto the facade of the American nation in the same way that Emma Lazarus’ poem The New Colossus was unceremoniously bolted onto the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty with remarkably little public input or approval.

The Statue of Liberty was a gift from the French people to congratulate the American nation for living up to its professed ideals of freedom for all men in the wake of the Civil War. This gift, one worthy of celebration, was transformed and taken away from the American nation by Lazarus’ poem in much the same way that the history of America has been weaponized against the American nation today.

Meanwhile, this poisonous anti-White and anti-civilizational form of politics which reframes the meaning and destiny of nations has infected Europe.

As Whites around the world continue to stand up in defense of their nations and their civilization it will become ever more important to present not only the problems but also the solutions and alternatives.

---

Please Support our mission to take on more writers and policy experts:

Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com

Buy us a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/wppi

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi

Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750