I'm an advocate for a 'talent society'. The goal of public policy in a talent society is to maximize the value of each person's talents to themselves and to their community. There's no reason that fertile females' special talent for nurturing and giving birth should *define* them, but it's also extremely wasteful to inhibit fertile women making use of this special talent to bring value to themselves (in personal satisfaction in motherhood) as well as value to the community's future existence.
The exact same thing could be said for men.
What each of us finds 'defines' us isn't perfectly circumscribed to the 'male' and 'female' aspects of our existence. In a society where duty is always coupled to 'rights', one might have a talent for something that one is not really inclined to utilize but do so 'for the good of the community'. For some, that's how motherhood might be experienced. And sacrifice that such women make is worthy of commemoration and reward. Just as it would be for a man in the same situation. For those who exhibit both the talent and the inclination to pursue a particular course in life, the rewards are intrinsic. But, just because these folks experience intrinsic rewards does not mean they ought not be publicly commended as well.
A truly pro-White society of the future values each White person and nurtures their talents to their - and society's - satisfaction while maintaining the idea that 'doing one's duty' is rewarded and respected by all those around us.
The complexities of decision-making forced upon young White women is the result of a dysfunctional economic and policy environment that devalues everyone. Alienation and misallocation of resources isn't just a female thing or a male thing. It's capitalist thing. And we can walk past it on the way toward a better, Whiter future.
I'm an advocate for a 'talent society'. The goal of public policy in a talent society is to maximize the value of each person's talents to themselves and to their community. There's no reason that fertile females' special talent for nurturing and giving birth should *define* them, but it's also extremely wasteful to inhibit fertile women making use of this special talent to bring value to themselves (in personal satisfaction in motherhood) as well as value to the community's future existence.
The exact same thing could be said for men.
What each of us finds 'defines' us isn't perfectly circumscribed to the 'male' and 'female' aspects of our existence. In a society where duty is always coupled to 'rights', one might have a talent for something that one is not really inclined to utilize but do so 'for the good of the community'. For some, that's how motherhood might be experienced. And sacrifice that such women make is worthy of commemoration and reward. Just as it would be for a man in the same situation. For those who exhibit both the talent and the inclination to pursue a particular course in life, the rewards are intrinsic. But, just because these folks experience intrinsic rewards does not mean they ought not be publicly commended as well.
A truly pro-White society of the future values each White person and nurtures their talents to their - and society's - satisfaction while maintaining the idea that 'doing one's duty' is rewarded and respected by all those around us.
The complexities of decision-making forced upon young White women is the result of a dysfunctional economic and policy environment that devalues everyone. Alienation and misallocation of resources isn't just a female thing or a male thing. It's capitalist thing. And we can walk past it on the way toward a better, Whiter future.