The first and only enemy of 'Christians' is White non-Christians. It doesn't matter how 'nationalist' some black African pope is. He's still the enemy of White indigenous spirituality.
Whatever 'nationalism' Sarah might bring to the papacy, it will be the 'nationalism' of a church that considers itself 'universal' and doesn't care about Whites as Whites.
The Catholic church is currently one of the biggest funders/perpetrators of mass migration but needn't be so even as a universalist religion. Burke and Sarah both take this stance, and it would be a very positive sea change for Western nations.
Catholicism has always been at odds with European indigenous spirituality such as Germanic Paganism and the persecution of the Knights Templar was tragic. However, 62% of the world's White population are Christians of one form or another and it's become a de facto integral part of Western Civilization. Moreover White Evangelicals and White Catholics maintain above-replacement fertility rates compared to the rest of the White population. We don't care what religion Whites practice as long as they continue to survive and flourish in their countries.
'Universalist' anything is corrosive of tribal loyalties. As for 'fertility rates', the 'above-replacement' fertility of 'White Evangelicals' and 'White Catholics' isn't relevant if the resulting population has not resistance to race-mixing. Which it does not because of the 'universal' nature of their religion.
The fact that so many Whites consider themselves 'Christian' isn't an asset, it's a liability. 'Christianity' hasn't really helped Whites one iota for over a thousand years. That's a long time for an ideology to prove itself an asset and fail to do so.
A bunch of supernatural beliefs doesn't make a religion.
A 'religion' is something that binds a people to itself.
'Catholics' don't care if they race-mix because their religion supports race-mixing.
Even if Sarah were to become Pope, nothing would change about the Catholic 'universalist' mission of dissolving Whites into non-Whites via the miracle of 'salvation'.
'Christianity' is part of the way in which Whites are being destroyed. It's not a solution to that destruction.
'Christianity' does not serve the interests of the White race.
The only 'religion' that Whites need is White Nationalism in the form of 'Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason'.
It would be best, in my opinion it is essential, that a Western man lead a Western institution and that he lead that institution to renounce and reverse mass invasion migration of Western nations. Where are we when no Western man will assume control of and protect his own people?
The quote by that African is nice. But if it is up to aliens and aliens alone to defend a civilization's homeland, and its own ethnos is left to call for an alien to lead its defense, then we have entered the stage of capitulation and total forfeiture. We must urge the Church to defend us with one of us.
This is truly a grave situation. I would much rather see calls for an ethnic European and staunch defender our folk and our homeland in charge. I feel a sense of forboding that an alien put at the helm in the midst of so many weak, broken, dispirited and even broken men might be tempted to convince himself that if they won't defend themselves then why should he bother.
There is also the symbolism in the eyes of Africans that they are now the head of the Roman Catholic Church. This after our statues have been toppled, our entire history villified and demonized along with our demonization, and it was Africans as our supposed victims who were used to carry out these Western wide revolutions. It is Africans who are centered and elevated to the status of moral superiority above us. To elevate them to the head of the Church is to formalize and consent to that morally elevated status.
This cannot happen. It simply cannot happen for the symbolism of it alone. Every leftist traitor would point to it as an opening of the floodgates to total ethnic replacement in all of our institutions in the elite strata. It cannot happen, no matter how good his rhetoric.
See our reply above. Catholicism is universalist religion and is not tied to any particular ethnicity. What matters to us is a Pope that will cut funding to mass migration operations and support self-determination for its adherents in their own countries. There is no doubt that either Burke or Sarah would be a good pick. Burke is unlikely. Sarah is ideologically sound on immigration, and you've got to admit that's a great quote.
The first and only enemy of 'Christians' is White non-Christians. It doesn't matter how 'nationalist' some black African pope is. He's still the enemy of White indigenous spirituality.
Whatever 'nationalism' Sarah might bring to the papacy, it will be the 'nationalism' of a church that considers itself 'universal' and doesn't care about Whites as Whites.
The Catholic church is currently one of the biggest funders/perpetrators of mass migration but needn't be so even as a universalist religion. Burke and Sarah both take this stance, and it would be a very positive sea change for Western nations.
Catholicism has always been at odds with European indigenous spirituality such as Germanic Paganism and the persecution of the Knights Templar was tragic. However, 62% of the world's White population are Christians of one form or another and it's become a de facto integral part of Western Civilization. Moreover White Evangelicals and White Catholics maintain above-replacement fertility rates compared to the rest of the White population. We don't care what religion Whites practice as long as they continue to survive and flourish in their countries.
'Universalist' anything is corrosive of tribal loyalties. As for 'fertility rates', the 'above-replacement' fertility of 'White Evangelicals' and 'White Catholics' isn't relevant if the resulting population has not resistance to race-mixing. Which it does not because of the 'universal' nature of their religion.
The fact that so many Whites consider themselves 'Christian' isn't an asset, it's a liability. 'Christianity' hasn't really helped Whites one iota for over a thousand years. That's a long time for an ideology to prove itself an asset and fail to do so.
A bunch of supernatural beliefs doesn't make a religion.
A 'religion' is something that binds a people to itself.
'Catholics' don't care if they race-mix because their religion supports race-mixing.
Even if Sarah were to become Pope, nothing would change about the Catholic 'universalist' mission of dissolving Whites into non-Whites via the miracle of 'salvation'.
'Christianity' is part of the way in which Whites are being destroyed. It's not a solution to that destruction.
'Christianity' does not serve the interests of the White race.
The only 'religion' that Whites need is White Nationalism in the form of 'Whites caring about Whites because they are White and no other reason'.
Interracial relationships are a rare a fact of life and a consequence of open borders, not of Catholicism.
It would be best, in my opinion it is essential, that a Western man lead a Western institution and that he lead that institution to renounce and reverse mass invasion migration of Western nations. Where are we when no Western man will assume control of and protect his own people?
The quote by that African is nice. But if it is up to aliens and aliens alone to defend a civilization's homeland, and its own ethnos is left to call for an alien to lead its defense, then we have entered the stage of capitulation and total forfeiture. We must urge the Church to defend us with one of us.
This is truly a grave situation. I would much rather see calls for an ethnic European and staunch defender our folk and our homeland in charge. I feel a sense of forboding that an alien put at the helm in the midst of so many weak, broken, dispirited and even broken men might be tempted to convince himself that if they won't defend themselves then why should he bother.
There is also the symbolism in the eyes of Africans that they are now the head of the Roman Catholic Church. This after our statues have been toppled, our entire history villified and demonized along with our demonization, and it was Africans as our supposed victims who were used to carry out these Western wide revolutions. It is Africans who are centered and elevated to the status of moral superiority above us. To elevate them to the head of the Church is to formalize and consent to that morally elevated status.
This cannot happen. It simply cannot happen for the symbolism of it alone. Every leftist traitor would point to it as an opening of the floodgates to total ethnic replacement in all of our institutions in the elite strata. It cannot happen, no matter how good his rhetoric.
You’ve lost your way, bro.
See our reply above. Catholicism is universalist religion and is not tied to any particular ethnicity. What matters to us is a Pope that will cut funding to mass migration operations and support self-determination for its adherents in their own countries. There is no doubt that either Burke or Sarah would be a good pick. Burke is unlikely. Sarah is ideologically sound on immigration, and you've got to admit that's a great quote.
The Catholic Church is a spent force, tbh. A black leader will only accelerate its demise.
Remember when you used to talk about things like practical ways to remove Puerto Ricans from our nation? Go back to that.
I hope you will read the articles before and after this one in our archives. Perhaps you'll find either of those to your taste instead.