White Australia is in Crisis (2/2)
Demographic change and dogmatic anti-White rhetoric are sinking the Australian nation
White Australians, or simply Australians, have suffered immensely in the past several decades as their nation, like every other White nation, has been subsumed into the neoliberal order and the political institutions and culture which rules the modern West.
Now, after outlining how massive non-White migration has transformed Australia’s demography, standards of living, and future prospects in a previous piece, we are going to take a moment to examine a more immediate threat: The Indigenous Voice to Parliament.
The proposal, which we will hereafter refer to by its popular moniker: The Voice, is designed to change the constitution of Australia and, in the words of the Australian government: “be representative of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, gender balanced and include youth”.
In more easily understood language, the Voice will create a permanent set of institutions which have perpetual and uninhbited access to the Australian parliament and executive. This would give the aboriginal population of Australia a permanent racial lobby with unlimited access to the powerbrokes of the Australian state at every level.
A mere 891,000 people, the total aboriginal population, though this is likely a gross over-estimate, would have more direct access to the Australian state than the roughly 18-20 million White Australians who founded and built the nation which the neoliberal ruling class so eagerly wish to usurp.
The reality goes much deeper than direct quotes from the official government propaganda promoting a “yes” vote for the voice in an upcoming nation-wide referendum.
Documents released by the Australian government after a freedom of information request reveal that the Voice is set up in such a way that it will enable treaty-making which will systematically disadvantage White Australians by forcing them to pay reparations, ever increasing social benefits and giving Aboriginals deciding power over national symbolism.
These revelations were reinforced by Thomas Mayo, a co-author of the Voice to Parliament proposal. Among other potential policies mentioned were charging “rent” to White Australians for living in their own country, and the abolition of Australian institutions deemed “colonial” (perhaps the Monarchy? parliamentary governance? state governments? immigration authorities?).
White Australians face the very rear prospect of losing what little influence they have left over their own nation, though not all is lost. Support for voice has been consistently declining since the truths of what White Australians are being asked to give away have begun to emerge. Just recently, and for the first time since poll tracking began in June of 2022, a larger share of Australians have said they would vote against the Voice than would vote for it.
The prospect of the Voice referendum being decided with a “no” vote is now so strong that Aboriginal leaders have begun to beg both the Australian public and the Australian state to "compromise” and save the Voice.
Nationalists have said for many years that we were never asked to vote away our demographic majorities in our own homelands, and this is true.
Now, for perhaps the first time a White nation has been asked, in no uncertain terms, to voluntarily give away their sovereignty to a racially foreign people with an actively malicious agenda, and that White nation, the Australian nation, is saying no.