Understanding Repatriation

Michael Gove seems confused about our pro-White policies!

Michael Gove, Britain's Secretary of State for Levelling Up, has made a speech in parliament pushing for a new type of ban on political parties and groups on the "extreme right" and explicitly mentioning Patriotic Alternative and their supposed policies.

Of these ethnic nationalists Mr. Gove said:

“I’m sure that we would agree that organisations such as the British National Socialist Movement and Patriotic Alternative who promote neo-Nazi ideology, argue for forced repatriation, a white ethno-state and the targeting of minority groups for intimidation, are precisely the type of groups about which we should be concerned and whose activities we will assess against the new definition.”

We could not be more pleased that nationalism is on the minds of the British people. The Conservative government would not be reacting in this way if it did not feel the pressure of nationalists. The hearts and minds of the British public are clearly open to nationalism, and this is supported by the data.

According to a poll from the Police Institute of King’s College London, some 32% of the British are aware of the ongoing Great Replacement of Whites both in their own homeland and across the West. Only 29% of the British public are sure that the Great Replacement is “definitely” false/not occurring. This suggests that 70% or more of the British public are open to the idea, with a third already aware.

The We Were Never Asked Project also surveyed 2022 people on the streets of Britain, with 1002 being men and 1020 being women. The data revealed that most British are not supportive of the Great Replacement with 68.5% of respondents viewing demographic change as a bad thing. Only 4.8% of respondents viewed demographic change as positive, and 26.3% had no strong feelings. This percent is, interestingly enough, nearly the same percentage as those who believe the Great Replacement is false in the King’s College Survey (29%).

Clear majorities of British men (74%) and British women (63%) view demographic change as bad. Similarly, a majority of Britains under 30 (52%) and above 30 (71%) view the displacement of the native British as negative. It is clear that there is strong public interest in the demographic composition of the United Kingdom and therefore an interest in policy and political discussions to rectify the ongoing replacement of Whites in the United Kingdom.

With the foundational public interest clearly there it only makes sense that nationalist organizations in the United Kingdom are active in campaigning against the Great Repatriation and have gone so far as to commission policy papers outlining how the demographic course could be corrected.

Considering that White-Papers wrote PA's policy paper on demographics and we have published other policy recommendations to restore native Britons to the dominant ethnic group in their homeland it would only seem correct that we help the clearly confused Mr. Gove understand.

Repatriation Policy:

Roughly 9.5 million people from an ethnic minority live in England, Wales, and Scotland. Between 1991 and 2021/2022 the native British fell from 90% of the UK’s overall population to 75%. The British population continues to fall roughly 5-7% for each decade that the Great Replacement continues.

Our policy paper on restoring the native British to a healthy demographic state in their own country suggests three points of action that nationalist policymakers could take:

1. The cancellation of visas and other forms of residence

2. Repatriation of non-White and foreign criminals

3. Denaturalization of dual nationals and those who threaten the British public

4. Financial incentives for the remaining minority residents

There are 2.4 to 2.6 million non-EU visa holders in the United Kingdom. These residents, who do not hold citizenship, can be removed from the country simply by canceling their visas and enforcing deportations. The overwhelming majority of these visa holders (some 2.1 to 2.3 million) are of a minority background.

A further 1.6 million ethnic minority residents of the the United Kingdom have been convicted of a crime. These individuals, should their hold a foreign passport or be eligible to do so, can be denaturalized under current British law.

In the case of criminals and any other person with dual citizenship, legislation exists that currently enables the Home Secretary to denaturalize any dual national of the UK, or person able to attain another nationality – determining that an individual is legally subject to denaturalization is achieved by applying one or more of three criteria:

a) should it be considered that doing so is conducive to the public good;

b) if the person obtained their citizenship through fraud, false representation or concealment; or

c) if the persons has conducted himself or herself in a manner which is, quote: “seriously prejudicial to the vital interests of the United Kingdom”.

Criminals, spies, and foreign agents all clearly fall into categories A and B. Minority criminals and anti-British persons are both not conducive to the public good and pose a threat to the UK’s vital interest.

An analysis has shown over 50% of Asians and 40% of Africans in the United Kingdom are liable for or already possess dual nationality. This would cover some 3.35 million more people, bringing the total available to be repatriated up to 5.45 million people.

Mr. Gove might notice that we do not advocate for the rounding up of law-abiding British citizens simply for being from a minority group, and instead we wish to facilitate demographic change in as peaceful a way as possible which is in line with both current UK and international law. The Tory government has been ‘dedicated’ to increasing the rate and number of deportations for over a decade, after all.

The second point of misunderstanding for Mr. Gove would appear to be over the concept of an ethno-state.

A British State:

Mr. Gove lambasts those in Britain who supposedly wish to create a “White ethno-state.” There are two problems with this statement.

The first is the British nationalists seek to create a White state, but an explicitly British state. To quote the Patriotic Alternative website:

“The British people are made up of the English, Northern Irish, Scottish and Welsh. These are the indigenous peoples of the United Kingdom and only they have an ancestral claim to it. The United Kingdom is the only place where the British people, and they alone, can realise their natural, cultural, religious and historical right to self-determination. As such, we will pass a Nation State Law to enshrine this principle and ensure the British people never become a minority or second class citizens in their ancestral homeland.”

The British, composed of a family of nations, happen to be a White people. British nationalists are not advocating that Poles, Romanians, Canadians, or any other White people can simply wander into the United Kingdom in the same way that the Conservative government allows Indians or Nigerians to arrive by their millions. Instead, British nationalists, and White Papers, back the idea of a British state which is explicitly dedicated to the native British.

Mr. Gove too supports ethno-states, including states with nation-state laws! In October of 2023, Gove gave a speech at a public rally where he explicitly endorsed the Jewish nature of the so-called State of Israel. The Tory government, which has been in power for 13 uninterrupted years, also maintains friendly relations with Malaysia. Article 160 of the Malaysian constitution explicitly acknowledges the Malay race’s right to rule their nation-state, unencumbered by their ethnic minority populations.

The British are as deserving of their own nation-state as any other group which Michael Gove maintains strong and favorable relations with.

Conclusion:

As White Papers wrote many of the finer points of these policies, including in pieces here on our substack, we invited Michael Gove to contact us. We would be very pleased to explain to him, yet again, what policies nationalists want to see and where the British public stands on the Great Replacement.

We are happy that our ideas are becoming so influential that the British government is responding to them!

White Papers and nationalists everywhere will continue the struggle. To quote Laura Towler, wife of political prisoner Sam Melia and Deputy Leader of Patriotic Alternative:

“British people exist as a distinct group of people. We are the English, the Scottish, the Welsh, etc. We should be the overwhelming majority of the population of our homeland: Great Britain. I will never apologise for wanting that, and Patriotic Alternative will never compromise on this stance. It’s something that the majority of British people want. If this is now “extremism”, then I am a proud “extremist”. The Government labelling this as extremism only shows how weak and fragile they are.”

---

Support our mission to interact with more policymakers:

Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com

Buy us a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/wppi

Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi

Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750