Trump Vs. South Africa: It’s Not Supremacy, Mr. Ambassador
The Scaremongering Doesn’t Work Anymore.
By Alex C.
The diplomatic spat between the anti-White regime in South Africa and the Trump administration continues to escalate and nationalists should be keenly interested.
In a recent Zoom call the South African ambassador to the United States, one Ebrahim Rasool, accused the Trump administration of “mobilizing a supremacism” and attempting to “project white victimhood as a dog whistle”.
The ambassador went on to explain that there are “great demographic shifts” occurring here in the United States that would reduce the White population of the country to 48% in the near future and that Trump was attacking South Africa not for its treatment of its Afrikaner minority but because the South African regime is “the antidote to supremacism”.
As a result of this uncalled-for tirade the US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has announced that ambassador Rasool is now persona non grata in the United States and will be expelled shortly.
There is a lot to unpack here!
First of all, the American state is not engaging in any form of supremacism. Racial supremacy, insofar as it actually exists anywhere in the world, is an ideology that serves no operable purpose. Were any state to operate on a truly supremacist basis it would be so militant internationally and violent internally as to be unsustainable.
Perpetual war, which supremacism necessitates, makes the ideology effectively inoperable. The few truly racially supremacist regimes that did exist, namely the failed NSDAP regime, did so for only a very short time before their militancy undermined their existence.
Even systems which significantly segregated races, such as apartheid South Africa and the segregationist Southern United States, proved unsustainable due to the amount of state investment required to maintain things as patently ridiculous as separate water fountains, public spaces, and infrastructure.
Instead, what ambassador Rasool is objecting to, just like any leftist here in the West or United Nations functionary objects to, is the mere appearance that a people of European descent are looking out for our own national, ethnic, and cultural interests.
Addressing Orania
For those not aware Orania is a town in South Africa established by Afrikaners, the European ethnic group that founded the nation of South Africa (in conjunction with people of British extraction).
As I will soon highlight the South African government does not mind various forms of nationalism and only objects to it when Western peoples stand up for ourselves. This is evident in the fact that South Africa maintains very cordial relationships with Malaysia. Malaysia’s late prime minister Mahathir Mohamad was the first foreign leader to visit Nelson Mandela after he was released from prison and the two countries continue to work extremely closely together.
What makes this noteworthy is that despite maintaining broad legal equality between all citizens the government of Malaysia maintains a system of race-based quotas that give preference to native/ethnic Malays in the government, in public education, and in the realm of economics. This preference for native Malays in their native land is baked into section 153 of the Constitution of Malaysia.
Malaysian constitutional and political policies that give preference to the ethnic Malays are leagues closer to the caricature racial supremacism that ambassador Rasool has so unjustly accused the United States of.
There are no mainstream parties in continental Europe, North American, Australia, or New Zealand that advocate for race-based segregation or depriving certain individuals of certain rights on the basis of their race. There are no large policy institutions recommending racial segregation be enshrined into law in the West – White Papers has never once advocated for segregation or legal inequality based upon race and instead believes that demographic scrutiny should take place at external borders not through separate legal standards based on race – and the Trump administration certainly has not implemented any policies that one might call “supremacist” and from what I can tell it would be loathed to do so.
The reason I feel nationalists should find ambassador Rasool’s accusations so inflammatory is because even the slightest self-confident actions by a Western leader have led to accusations of racial supremacy. Common sense nationalists in the West should be rhetorically and factually prepared to counter signal these accusations and call out these scaremongers for what they are: anti-White bigots.
Because the American people, and the people of the West in general, want to put an end to mass immigration we are accused of Nazi-tier racial supremacy. By a government, the South African government, which currently has more race-based laws on its books than during the peak of Apartheid. Laws which are almost universally targeted against the country’s White minority.
The American people and the rest of the West are eager for the mass deportation of illegal immigrants, an end to birthright citizenship, and for our cultural displacement to cease. Because of these commonsense positions we are accused of “hatred” by international organizations that demand we respect “tolerance, equality, rights, and dignity” unless of course it is the right and dignity of a Western people to determine our political and cultural future.
Western countries want to take control of our borders and keep foreign criminals off our streets. In response to the United States deporting illegal Venezuelan immigrants there are organizations like Amnesty International who accuse the country of violating international law. This is the same organization that is currently up in arms about the “human rights” of violent cartel member in El Salvadoran prisons.
And when Western publics demand an end to the massive waves of economic migration from poor developing countries to the West it is multilateral organizations like the United Nations that demand we recognize migrant workers as “indispensable” and that we sign up to ridiculous migration pacts. This is extremely rich coming from an organization that puts Qatari, Emirati, and Saudi Arabian officials in charge of Human Rights based bodies. These countries hold millions of South Asian workers in what amounts to indentured servitude at wages levels only a hint better than slavery.
The demands of the growing majority of people in the West are simple: stop the mass immigration, respect our democratic voice, put our culture and inheritance first domestically, and end the multicultural experiment that is impoverishing and displacing us.
It really says a lot that when an administration such as Trump’s even attempts to end discrimination against Whites the universal condemnations start flowing in. Perhaps it is much of the rest of the world that has a problem with “race hatred” and the people of the West are done being the target.
Support White Papers:
Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi
Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750
"There are no mainstream parties in continental Europe, North American, Australia, or New Zealand that advocate for race-based segregation or depriving certain individuals of certain rights on the basis of their race. "
I don't believe that is true. The Democrat party, and even the mainstream of the Republican party support race based policies. "Diversity", means, discriminating against whites in order that whites have fewer opportunities and thus there are fewer of us in every sphere of life. That is in effect, ethnic cleansing. The US miltary under John Goldfein, C.Q. Brown and others have undertaken ethnic cleansing of White men from the US military under the guise of "Diversity." Every corporation is engaged in White erasure and, "diversity", initiatives. The establishment condones iconoclasm and cultural genocide in our imagery, history. JFK is being renovated in a multi-billion dollar project and White men were/are ineligible for any of the contracts in the name of equity and diversity.
Ebrahim Rosool is gleeful when he says that Whites will soon be only 48% of the population of America. He is saying that for a reason. He is saying that the majority rules and he is laying the groundwork for the legitimacy of making America into a new South Africa.
Americans are in a very bad situation. We are already second class citizens for several decades when we were the majority. I think Rosool's rhetoric is aimed at America being South Africanized much sooner than we think. In fact the Revolution of 2008 - 2020 was the people who want to oppress and dispossess White people had both hands on America's throat squeezing as hard as it could.
It is unwise to understate the venom of Rosool and his vision for our people. We are sick of being victims of the evils of the WW2 International Consensus that has dispossessed us. We not only want our homelands and political sovereignty back, we will get them back. The hour is late. Rosool and Ramaphosa and Malewa and their brothers in our countries are on the cusp of victory. The can see it, taste it and touch it. He is getting to the magic 48%. Then they will claim the majority and use that to justify what happened in Rhodesia and South Africa.
We cannot let that happen.