Editor’s note: I am very pleased to welcome Mrs. Vivian P. as our first regular female contributor here at White Papers. Vivan, an American, will focus her attention on what are commonly called ‘kitchen table’ issues such as household economics, inflation, and public safety.
Like most American women (56%) I control the household budget - and as I sit at the kitchen table, juggling the family budget and planning our next grocery run, I can’t help but reflect on how precarious our current economic climate feels. It’s not just the headlines or the fluctuating stock markets that worry me; it’s the tangible impact on our daily lives that makes me anxious. This anxiety has come and gone in waves since the COVID-19 pandemic.
My husband and I, like many couples, have worked hard to build a comfortable life for ourselves and our children. We’ve managed to save a bit, he has invested prudently, and we live within our means. Yet, despite our best efforts, the sense of economic instability seems to be growing stronger. It's as if no matter how carefully we plan, we’re always one unexpected expense away from a crisis.
And we are not the only ones. According to a study published in Forbes Advisor 78% of our fellow Americans are living paycheck to paycheck as of 2023. This is a 6% increase from the 2022 figures. Even more concerning to me, perhaps because I have teenagers, is that Gen Z reports the highest monthly bills, the lowest income, and the most unexpected emergencies. How are our young people supposed to get ahead when the entire economy appears structured to keep them down?
As almost any American (or European for that matter) will know the cost of living has been creeping up steadily since the pandemic. From the prices at the gas pump to the cost of a simple family meal, every aspect of our budget feels stretched. In one, admittedly non-official, experiment conducted by The TexMex Mom she highlighted that a standard Aldi grocery run which cost $50.66 in 2019 now costs $77.68 in 2024. This is a 53.5% jump in the cost of this particular basket of groceries!
This is unsurprising, official Department of Agricultural (USDA) statistics show that food-at-home prices (groceries) increased by 3.5% in 2020, 3.9% in 2021, 11.4% in 2022, and 5% in 2023. USDA goes on to explain they expect food-at-home prices to increase by 1% over the course of 2024 and 0.7% for all of 2025. These figures seem tame compared to the previous years, but they truly are not. The price of beef is expected to increase by 4.4% while ‘fats and oils’ will experience a 3.4% increase.
Filling up the gas tank is also more expensive than in 2019. Between November 2014 and April 2021, the average retail gas price in the United States never exceeded $3 per gallon and hovered around $2.55 a gallon for most of that period. But, post-May 2021, the gas price has never fallen below $3.20 per gallon and has consistently stayed above $3.50 per gallon.
Is it any wonder that 58% of Americans told Monmouth University in May of 2022 that they were having difficulty affording gas? In another poll, this time conducted by Gallup, 62% of Americans said they were traveling less this summer due to high gas prices - the highest figure since Gallup began asking this question in June of 2000.
Then there is the job market …
My husband and I have been fortunate to have stable jobs through and since the pandemic. He has leveraged his union job for excellent healthcare benefits and a stable wage and I was able to take full advantage of the pandemic work-from-home revolution (at least for a while).
But, I recently fell victim to the mass tech layoffs that are rocking the American economy. Roughly 200,000 tech workers were laid off in 2023 and more than 75,000 tech workers have been laid off so far in 2024 with Intel opening August by announcing it was laying off 15,000 employees.
These mass tech layoffs represent a particular economic hit for Whites as we make up 70% of the tech workforce and it is one of the few career paths that offered a family wage once exiting college. And then there is the female factor. Recent data has shown that women in the tech sector are 65% more likely to face layoffs than men. Two women are even going so far as to sue Twitter (now X) because it laid off 57% of its female workforce!
Stories of colleagues facing layoffs or struggling to find new employment are all too common. Even in fields considered relatively stable, the fear of sudden job loss or a pay cut looms large.
Generally, I would not make a ‘gendered’ point about layoffs, but these layoffs are affecting mothers more than anyone else. Female tech workers, who tend to specialize more in marketing, HR, design, and other ‘front end’ roles, can work from home at rates far higher than the average worker according to a 2023 MIT article. This means that tens if not hundreds of thousands of women who could work from home and take care of their children now face layoffs and the loss of a (more) ideal work-life balance with no guarantee that their next job will offer the same opportunity.
And is it any wonder? The number of unemployed in the United States has increased by one million individuals since January of 2024 and now stands at 7.163 million with the most recent 500,000 having been laid off since May! For Whites, the number of jobless has increased from 4.3 million in January of 2024 to 4.8 million in the most recent June data. It is interesting to note that the Black unemployed have only gone up by about 220,000 in that same period, less than half the figure for Whites.
This does not surprise me though, as White Papers has before covered the increasing gap between Whites and Blacks. I remember the piece on White wages showing that Whites had yet to recover to their 2019 level of income while African Americans had not only recovered their pre-COVID income level but had surpassed it.
Now, we are watching the wealthy panic over the sharp decline in the stock market as they begin to worry about a pending recession. This panic by the wealthy leaves many of us, especially the wives and mothers sitting at the kitchen table balancing the household checkbook, slightly amused. Pending recession? We’ve been in a quality-of-life recession for years!
Food is expensive, gas even more so, finding a job is a truly Herculean task, and we worry about the future of our children perhaps more than we worry about ourselves.
Homeownership, which once felt like the ultimate symbol of stability, now feels like a high-stakes gamble. Property taxes, maintenance costs, and rising interest rates are constant concerns. We bought our home years ago, but the pressure to keep up with payments and maintain our property is ever-present. The idea of moving to a more affordable place or downsizing is a daunting thought, fraught with uncertainty and emotional attachment.
This speaks to an even broader emotional toll affecting all Americans. The constant worry about finances, coupled with the pressures of maintaining a stable home environment for our children, can be overwhelming. Women in particular face a greater uphill battle in the face of economic hardship. We are 5 points less likely than men to be able to pay all of our bills on time and in full, we are 4 points less likely to be able to cover three months of expenses with savings, and when precarity becomes particularly bad we are more likely to rely on credit cards.
This is not because women are less financially responsible (again, almost 60% of us manage the budget in married households), but because we are often the first to face layoffs while being obligated to the daily welfare of dependents, namely children, in a way that men rarely are. We purchase the clothes, we buy the groceries, and we take them to school, the doctor, and extracurriculars.
To put it even more simply: if the gap in the grocery budget has to be filled for the month or we need to make a sudden school-related purchase it is our credit card being used to make up the shortfall, not our husband’s.
Lest I be accused of engaging in gender ‘warfare’ it is here I should remind the reader that it is male wages, especially White male wages, that have gone stagnant in the face of the ‘precarity economy’ we live in. Men are working more overtime than ever before, with roughly 30% of men now working overtime every day just to make up for the lack of wage increases and in many cases wage stagnation which Americans (but especially men) have faced for decades.
Balancing the need to provide for our families has slowly eroded American’s free time and is beginning to affect our relationships. The stress often seeps into our personal lives, affecting our relationships and overall well-being.
Estimates show that 20 to 40 percent of divorces in the United States are related to financial problems and a further 54% of Americans believe that debt-related issues are appropriate grounds for a divorce. At a time when American families should be coming together to weather the economic storm, we are being split apart by the stress of an economy beyond our control.
Financial strain not only results in emotional stress but can also lead to physical abuse. The Department of Justice has found that the number of women experiencing victimization at the hands of their partner more than doubles from 2% to 5% when a couple is feeling financial strain. The Justice Department also found that the financial strain can serve to trap women in these abusive relationships and often lead to less stable employment for these women.
Similarly, the rate of intimate partner violence against women in relationships where the male was experiencing a period of unemployment nearly doubled from 4.7% to 7.5% while in relationships where men experienced numerous periods of unemployment intimate partner violence against women occurred in as many as 12.3% of cases. A nearly 3-fold increase compared to when men have stable employment.
If the elite, and particularly the government, are aware of the stress and strain that economic precarity puts on relationships (not to mention the danger it puts women in) why do they insist on continuing to build an economy that will only result in more of these deteriorating relationships that put women at risk?
Conclusion:
It’s almost insulting that the elite are only just now beginning to panic about the state of the economy while the rest of us have languished in its sorry state for years and in some cases decades (rural America never recovered from the 2008 recession).
Despite these challenges, I am grateful for the support system I have. Having a partner who shares the financial responsibilities and emotional burdens is a blessing. We work together to navigate these uncertain times and discuss our concerns openly. Yet, even with this support, the reality is that economic precarity is a heavy weight to carry.
Millions of women (and, yes, men) have been dealing with a deteriorating economy for years and the alarm over recession is ultimately old news to us.
Support White Papers’ mission to investigate and promote pro-White policies!
Zelle: whitepapersinstitute@protonmail.com
Buy us a coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/wppi
Linktree: https://linktr.ee/wppi
Snail Mail: White Papers Policy, PO Box 192, Hancock, MD 21750
Ms. Vivian gives an excellent account of life in the real world of a household, a world far removed from government presss releases.
One point, though, needs to be made.
Without being a rightwing crank, it can be said that the official government statistics cited in her article are just Regime pap.
They are as untrue as the glowing reports of the successful cabbage harvests on the collective farms back in Communism days in the Soviet Union.
There's little secret about how the government fixes the inflation figures.
Ronald Reagon introduces the formulas and devices used by the government so as to "stabilize" (reduce) the inflation figures and thereby keep Social Security solvent because it would be busted if the annual increases in benefits actually correlated to the increased cost of living.
As is almost always the case with such schemes the methods used become more and more dramatic with the passage of time.
Under Biden we can be sure the adjustments have been staggering.
Indeed, a comparison between the actual figures guoted by Ms. Vivian on the increases in food, gasoline and so on to the official rates of inflation issued by the government that she also quotes will show anyone with minimal abilities in mathematics that the increase in actual prices are many times over what the increases would be if calculated using the official inflation rates.
The REAL inflation rate is how much more people have to pay this year than they paid last year.
The official inflation rate does not reflect this.
The official inflation rate is recalculated from the price increases through various dishonest tricks such as:
a. The government "adjusts" the increases so as not to "double-count" inflation. Therefore, if food goes up 20% and gasoline goes up 20%, they claim that part of the rise in food prices is due to the rise in the cost of gasoline prices and vice versa. So the rates are knocked down, say 8% points, so as not to double-count.
b. The prices are adjusted to reflect the alleged fact that everything get better and better every year. Everyone, so the story goes, knows that things just get better and better in Camelot. The cars this year are better than the cars last year. So, if the cost of a car goes up, say, 10%, 5% point can be deducted because this year's cars are better made than last year's cars and part of the superficial price increase is not really inflation, it represents improvement.
Through gimmicks like this the government can run the colossal multi-trillion deficits and finance the wars that enrich Liz and Daddy Dick Cheney and their friends in the military industrial complex and understate the inflation rate so that the braindead American voters will not connect the dots and see how much the sailor-on-leave spending is affecting us.
And the government can see to it that the cost of living adjustment to Social Security payments is minimal because it's based not on what the old geezers living off SS benefits have to pay but on the "corrected" government figures.
Old people who are dependent on Social Security, a fixed pension or a pension that increases according to the government's figures must be reeling from the dramatic reduction in their purchasing power. They must be really suffering as is shown by drastic drops recently in charitable giving because old people don't have the money to make such gifts.
Young people and middle aged people also are being slammed, if not so much, because their wage increases do not equal the much greater increases in the prices of what they buy.
However, there are dramatic benefits from how the inflation rate is adjusted.
It enables Joe Biden and will enable his successor
Thanks Vivian. It’s great to have reportage from a patriotic lady about the pressures on the home front.