Labour Launches Attack On The House Of Lords Because “They Are All White Men!”

Lord Pearson of Rannoch: “There Appear To Have Been Upwards Of 250,000 Young White Girls Raped In This Century, Very Largely By Muslim Men.”

In a clip that has recently been making the rounds of social media, Lord Pearson of Rannoch (above) asked the following question in Britain’s House of Lords.

My Lords, do the Government accept that if we extrapolate nationally the Jay report on Rotherham and other reports from Telford and Oxford, there appear to have been upwards of 250,000 young white girls raped in this century, very largely by Muslim men, usually several times a day for years? What is the Government’s answer to the chief constable of Northumbria Police, who has just said that there is every likelihood that these grooming gangs are operating in every one of our major cities? What are the Government doing to prosecute those in authority who turned a blind eye to all this because they were afraid of being called Islamophobic and so on? What are they doing to compensate and help these victims mentally?

Sexual Offences—Volume 793: Hansard, October 22, 2018

This is the kind of thing more likely to be said by someone not facing re-election, and not under the thumb of his Party’s leaders.

Britain’s deeply unpopular Labour government has introduced legislation to abolish the 92 seats in the House of Lords (our upper chamber of parliament) reserved for Britain’s ancient hereditary peerage. This legislation would complete a project started under former Labour prime minister Tony Blair who successfully passed legislation which turned the House of Lords from an entirely hereditary body into one where most members were given “life peerages” (Lord Pearson is one, appointed by Tory government, but now supporting UKIP) and appointed by the major party of the day. In essence they politicized what was formerly a chamber of sober reflection.

Regardless of how one feels about the House of Lords the Labour government have made it clear through their Leader of the House of Lords, Baroness Smith, (a Life Peer appointed by Gordon Brown in 2010) that this move is an anti-White attack on the native British.

In this Sky News segment Baroness Smith (a white woman) being interviewed by Sky News correspondent Serena Barker-Singh first deigns to speak about how hereditary peerages are outdated and that by abolishing them it will establish a form of fairness.

Baroness Smith

She then follows up this incantation about fairness by saying (at 2:22), and I am quoting:

“In this day and age is it appropriate they’re reserved? They are all White men!”

What Baroness Smith has, probably unwittingly, let slip from her hateful tongue is that the Labour party is not interested in fairness or democracy, but in further abolishing the influence, voice, and political rights of the native British people over our own country. They view the removal of ancient hereditary leadership, at its core a tribal sort of leadership, as another blow against the idea that the United Kingdom is a country for the British people. This logic extends further, for if the White skin and native character of the hereditary peerage makes their place in modern British politics illegitimate it also stands to reason that the Royal Family, the Church of England, and any other number of ancient British institutions are illegitimate because of their supposed “Whiteness.”

The Labour party is restarting the Blairite project of systematically abolishing the British nature of Britain and will, given enough time and opportunity, turn this country in the modern “global economic zone” of the globalist age. And the media is entirely behind it.

The Sky News anchor, who is not of British origin herself, closes the report by saying “ … As this anachronistic anomaly in our political system comes to an end.”

First, it is not for the media or the government to determine what is anachronistic or not, but in saying this they are revealing their preferences. Hereditary peerage is built upon the idea of the married family passing down title and property to children, namely sons, born within wedlock and raised in a family home surrounded by family history, tradition and culture. The Left, liberals, Labour party and even many people on the modern mainstream right view history, culture, tradition, and especially the married family as a set of anachronistic institutions that get in the way of economic growth and social “development.”

Second, the House of Lords and its historic hereditary nature is not an anomaly but is instead an expression of the unique political system of the people of these islands. We established a parliament where the lower chamber is an elected body representing the public while the upper chamber was, traditionally, composed of a hereditary class offering sober reflection centered around the fundamental rights granted to Englishmen with the signing of the Magna Carta, properly called the Magna Carta Libertatum or the Great Charter of Freedoms.

It is this unique political system that inspired the liberty obsessed (and wildly successful) Constitution of the United States and has led to countless countries beyond those settled by the English establishing systems of government that broadly reflect that which the English established for ourselves. Now, the Labour party is attacking the “White men” (native British) who established one of if not the most free and stable political systems in the world by removing the voice of the British from our own institutions.

Every Conservative Member of Parliament who voted for this bill to abolish hereditary peerages has, perhaps unwittingly and perhaps not, given further consent to the radical project to abolish the British family and disenfranchise the native British people.

We should be working to strengthen the political, cultural, and demographic dominance of the native British in our own land. We should be working toward nationalism.