![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Ff1c00de2-1af6-4623-9e0e-c847724d9956_3800x3040.jpeg)
One: President Biden will lose the 2024 election
While we are uncomfortable attempting to predict which Republican is most likely to win the election, it is clear that Joe Biden is not winning. His approval ratings are dismal and the polling numbers are hardly any better. Trump is up an average of two points on the current sitting president and has led in 8 of the last 10 polls. These numbers stand in stark contrast to the 2020 opinion polling when Joe Biden led consistently for months, and generally by 5 to 7 points.
More significantly, though, is that Biden is trailing far behind in the polling in key swing states he won in 2020. Biden is behind by 5 to 7 points in Michigan, seven points behind Trump in Arizona, and four points behind in Wisconsin. It is also likely that the Republicans will take back the governors mansion in North Carolina, giving a future GOP president one more ally in state government.
The Pro-White angle comes in when you consider the track record of President Biden and the fact he has overseen the worst illegal immigration crisis, and highest numbers of legal immigration, in the nation’s history. His parole (legalization by way of executive fiat) programs have given millions of non-Whites access to the benefits which should be reserved for American citizens. Removing Biden from office and having a president elected who will do even the most meager immigration enforcement, and cease the parole programs, will do much to stem the tide of illegal immigration and demographic change.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F6845ee62-2b2d-4892-aedd-c13ed0735f6d_7354x4137.jpeg)
Two: Favorable rulings in Relentless v. Department of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo
American courts currently adhere to what is known as the “Chevron doctrine”. This doctrine, in short, gives Federal agencies the power to define ambiguous provisions of legislation, and to make their own rules and policies within that ambiguous space. The doctrine further requires that the Courts defer to the agency’s explanation of said policies and this generally results in American citizens losing challenges to Federal agencies in court.
This incredible power of agencies to regulate, and the imposition of deferral to ‘experts,’ has cost average Americans time and again.
The Supreme Court gave a positive indication of which way it is likely to rule when it sided against the EPA in August of 2023 in the case Sackett v. EPA. This was a 15 year long case in which the EPA was attempting to keep an American couple from building a home on land they own. The EPA had ordered the Sackett couple to restore a wetland which the EPA claimed was protected under ambiguous provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA) of 1972. The Supreme Court eventually decided that wetlands do not fall under the CWA, greatly limiting EPA power and handing wetland regulation back to states and local governments.
If the Chevron doctrine is overturned, or even weakened, it will force Congress to legislate more frequently, more clearly, and give American citizens more influence over their representatives.
Americans deserve influence over their elected representatives and to be free from regulatory fiat imposed by faceless “experts” in Federal agencies.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F78df30bf-b59c-482b-938d-e039fa78a159_5252x3501.jpeg)
Three: anti-immigration parties will continue rising and winning in Europe
The recent victories of Giorgia Meloni in Italy, Geert Wilders in the Netherlands, and the True Finns in Finland have been major advances for the pro-White cause. While figures like Meloni have governed terribly, her election on a blatantly nationalist manifesto was still significant.
Alternative for Germany continues to hold a healthy second place in the polling, while in Austria the FPÖ is leading by a wide margin. The FPÖ, or the Freedom Party, adheres to a concept known as Heimat (Homeland) which has strong ethnic connotations. And in Portugal the CHEGA party has ascended to third place and is rapidly climbing in the polls. CHEGA (meaning ENOUGH! in Portuguese) seeks to oppose all multicultural policies, to deport illegals, and any criminals with an immigrant background. A good start!
More significantly, though, is that European Parliament elections are taking place in June and all of these parties, and nationalist parties in other countries, are set to make major gains. The Identity and Democracy grouping, a coalition of nationalist and national-conservative parties, is polling in second place and could be in a position to prevent the significant expansions of EU power and authority planned for the coming years.
![](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5badfeb9-1da0-41f2-a2f9-6a0f5b717b50_3547x2365.jpeg)
Four: The Irish will take a stand
Building further on Keith Woods 10 Lessons from 2023 piece where he describes how the “Irish have had enough” we are confident in predicting that this outrage will turn into a genuine movement for change.
Immigration has taken over as the most common topic of conversation among right-wing social media accounts in Ireland, leapfrogging over health, homosexual politics, and Irish politics more generally. Additionally near 30% of Ireland’s population would consider supporting an anti-immigration party and with a mass exodus of Irish youth underway due to various crisis caused by immigration there is little choice left to the Irish but to take a stand and politically organize.
Five: Demographic policies will take center stage.
From Tucker Carlson to Charlie Kirk, and from Vivek Ramaswamy to Blake Masters (R-AZ) American media and political personalities are standing up to talk about the radical demographic change which is transforming the United States into a White minority country. Some of these personalities still hide their objections behind changes in voting habits, generally away from the GOP and toward the Democrats, but their core complaints are demographic. Everyone understands that “replacing” the American population with demographic who will perpetually vote for Democrats means replacing the White American population (the founding stock the nation) with non-Whites.
A great development in the direction of pro-White policymaking was the election of a pro-family, pro-small business, proud Oklahoman Judd Blevins to a commissioner position in Enid, Oklahoma despite his participation in the 2017 Unite the Right rally. We expect to see more openly pro-White and proudly nationalist candidates take up races and positions in local and state offices all over the country. With these newly elected officials, and even just their campaigns, will come increasing discussion about the demographic changes currently taking place in America.
White-Papers is prepared to provide all of these candidates and policymakers with support and solutions to reverse the demographic decline of the United States.
It is going to be a great 2024!
Blevins more or less repudiated his pro-White past, calling it 'foolish'.
https://www.newson6.com/story/655d7a3b8f221f06bc3ec864/enid-leaders-table-censure-measure-against-commissioner-with-alleged-white-supremacist-ties
I think Biden will win if he runs. If he loses, the GOP will do an amnesty in some form (ala Reagan).
The national GOP is not afraid of the electorate. They are, however, afraid of the Donor Class.
And we all know how those people feel about Whites.